Album Rating: 1.0

^^ I thought you couldn't comment when you're banned?

His mynameischan account is banned.

Album Rating: 1.0

Oh. Nevermind them. :p



By the way, I actually lostend to this album again not that long ago and I liked it a bit mor then I did the first time. I'm changing my rating to something a bit higher.

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

it would be better if the signer could sing like in waking the fallen.

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

His clean vocals on Waking the Fallen weren't that bad I thought, but please don't base your opinion on just Unholy Confessions (I'm sure you're not, but heh), that probably has his worst clean singing on the album.

He had good clean vocals on WTF.

this album is growing on me.

i have to say these guys we're really reaching out for a different sound. almost progressive?

i wonder what the next album will sound like................

Progressive? I don't think so.

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Boardering progressive.

Album Rating: 1.0

Wannabe progressive

[QUOTE=SCREAM!]Progressive? I don't think so.[/QUOTE]

btw i said it was "almost progressive?",in other words questioning my own statment.


all i know this is not your average modern metal. it has to fall under something...and progressive is the nearest thing.

Nah, not progressive. More like some kind of revival. Defenitely not progressive.

Album Rating: 3.0

Agreed. People seem to think that this is progressive just because the songs are long. That is definitely not the case.

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

I seem to think it's boarding progressive, because it uses some odd time signatures, it doesn't really follow any set song structure, it uses more instruments then just a guitar, bass, drums and vocals, the song lengths are an average of 7 minutes, and it's unique. It's not full-on Prog, but it's close.

Album Rating: 1.5

Avenged Sevenfold? PROGRESSIVE? HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAH. You're kidding right?

Album Rating: 4.0

then you could consider mudvayne progressive, without all of the cool guitar solos. thier time signatures are wierd, you could call it math metal (with the odd time signatures)

Album Rating: 1.5

Mudvayne rather are actually, especially L.D. 50.

Album Rating: 4.0

yes indeed

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Mudvayne are not, ARE NOT progressive in any sense. They practically define Nu-Metal except for the odd time sigs. Besides, if you were to have actually read my post you'd see I said that A7X were boarding progressive, but they weren't full on progressive.

Album Rating: 4.0

yeah, i read, i was just saying if it were just for odd time sigs, mudvayne would be progressive, but i know they aren't. they are just nu-metal.