Album Rating: 3.0

'Yeah this is something I always suspect. We're on a site where people are frequently trying to out-snark and out-edge each other but they all happen to arrive at the same opinion regarding The Beatles? Not sure about that one.'



do they? Hmm. I'm 'unique enough' to be rather underwhelmed by The Beatles and therefore (according to this thread), I may legitimately be authorised to exercise the freedom-of-thought to find this genuinely enjoyable.

Album Rating: 2.0

Ps production and engineering on this is superb, leagues above any of their contemporaries in terms of capturing detail whilst maintaining a ‘live’ sound.

Album Rating: 5.0

These guys are to metal what Gershwin was to classical music during the early 20th century.

Agreed about the production being superb.

About to 5 this not kidding. This may be a very important cult album at some point. Maybe even the Fas of this decade(nce). What DsO did opening the gates of obscure metaphysics and theological matters through music these guys have done with these times of uncertainty and volatility derived from (moral) decadence and capitalist degeneracy.

Album Rating: 4.0

'To your point, I believe the last Mamaleek (spelling?) record is where I feel the 'ugliness for the sake of ugliness' goes too far and breaks immersion.'



mamaleeks 2020 record was beautiful u r crazy

"do they?"

they don't / op was a dumb comment

Album Rating: 3.5

OK, I see I have the tag team to tackle this morning.



Is it 'dumb' to suggest there is a *possibility* of people not genuinely liking 'classic' records?

Album Rating: 3.5

"do they? Hmm. I'm 'unique enough' to be rather underwhelmed by The Beatles and therefore (according to this thread), I may legitimately be authorised to exercise the freedom-of-thought to find this genuinely enjoyable.'



how to misinterpret one sentence 101

"Is it 'dumb' to suggest there is a *possibility* of people not genuinely liking 'classic' records?"

No, there is no rule that you have to like classic records lol. I personally dislike a lot of the classics.

no and more people should do it

it is however extremely dumb to single out the Beatles as the classic band universally revered across all online discourse

Album Rating: 3.5

Oh



Well that is an issue with the pon3 I refuse to go out of bounds before I have coffee

I can't believe there are actual Beatles unenjoyers. Disgusting

Album Rating: 3.0

'how to misinterpret one sentence 101'



I think you're the one misinterpreting things here

Album Rating: 4.7

I think this thread is all a big misunderstanding

Album Rating: 3.5

If you were commenting in reference to my comment, then I do fear we are at a crossroads of big misinterpretation mi amigo.

Album Rating: 3.5

"I think this thread is all a big misunderstanding"



We have yet to even achieve Stare Into Death levels, this is nothing !

Album Rating: 3.0

I was disagreeing with the notion that The Beatles represent some sort of hive opinion where Sput is concerned, as clearly we don't all agree. It was Pon's comment.



Then I was admittedly being a bit silly by saying that being so unique as to not accept The Beatles brilliance allows me the individualism required to genuinely like something so unfathomably unlikeable such as this.



Not sure why I bothered to explain myself, Mars getting allowances here

Album Rating: 3.5

Because I am a kind gentle special soul and I deserve ur 110%



While using the Beatles as an example is probably not the best, I believe the spirit of Jac's comment isn't exactly off base.

because half the site gatekeepers are bottom feeders for the holy trinity of Floyd, TVU and Billy Corgan yh

Album Rating: 3.5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kz45sv9BDB4&ab_channel=MrEcted

omg dead