Album Rating: 4.5
I must admit, it's more 4.5 than five if we consider 5 meaning classic (original, groundbreaking, influeantial etc.). Well, my ratings on sputnik are mess:/
|
| |
nah I consider 5 an album you wouldn't change. Some people say "5 because there's nothing wrong with it", but there's a difference
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
its nowhere near a 4.5
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Yeah, for you it's clearly not. I can see it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
no not just for me
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
5 doesn't mean perfect. This album isn't perfect
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
lol thanks for that news flash kiddo
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
your right about that
|
| |
depends what you mean by perfect
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
i dont think i've ever heard a 100 percent perfect album, and this sure isn't even remotely close
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
there's only one definition of 'perfect'
|
| |
with regards to music, everyone's definition of perfect is different
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
it actually took me a while to get into the second half of this album
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
They're saying their new album should be out in the summer and it's "darker, heavier, bigger and more
technical" than THAN. And that there are things they regretted about THAN
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off
like the whole album
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I'm one of the few people who actually really liked it but it had a pretty short lasting value and I'd like it much more if they went back to the techy
|
| |
could never find a song on THAN that i liked besides Heartburn
don't hate
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Heartburn was so cringemaking
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
If I want to listen to Architects, I'll listen to their great album. [Nightmares]Not their mediocre and average efforts
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Well Nightmares is pretty good.
|
| |
|
|
