The Faceless Planetary Duality
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
R6Rider
January 12th 2010


5282 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

glad we share the same opinion on most things bloc

bloc
January 12th 2010


70880 Comments


same here, man. gotta love those Yamahas too.

R6Rider
January 12th 2010


5282 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

yes! someone finally knows what my screen name means



it's an '06, wanna buy it? lol

bloc
January 12th 2010


70880 Comments


you're selling? then your username becomes meaningless!

R6Rider
January 12th 2010


5282 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

exactly. I never really did like the name anyways, sounds toolish



but yeah I got a new car last year and rode the bike about 4 times, so it would be nice to get rid of it

bloc
January 12th 2010


70880 Comments


fair enough, make sure your new name is something good.

R6Rider
January 12th 2010


5282 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I'll try, it'll probably suck though haha

bloc
January 19th 2010


70880 Comments


it's so different though than their first, imo.

Burn2Burn
January 29th 2010


2374 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I like this more than Akeldama tbh

bloc
January 29th 2010


70880 Comments


Same, at first I liked Akeldama, but then I changed my mind.

But honestly, I hardly listen to either anymore.

Burn2Burn
January 29th 2010


2374 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I've been listening to this like a mofo lately. This is pretty much a definitive gym album for me.

zaruyache
February 10th 2010


28605 Comments


wut.

bloozclooz
February 23rd 2010


1770 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

nah dude it's too light for a gym album. none so vile is much better suited.

SepticReAnimate
March 2nd 2010


190 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Could not get into this album. All the "technicality" destroyed any flow in the music... all the songs sound like a bunch of random, unrelated guitar wanks thrown together.

supertouchox2
March 3rd 2010


1063 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

i used to think that, took ages to grow and it all became amazing.





bloc
March 5th 2010


70880 Comments


Maybe he's a slow learner

Burn2Burn
March 6th 2010


2374 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

wut.


wut?

R6Rider
March 6th 2010


5282 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Could not get into this album. All the "technicality" destroyed any flow in the music... all the songs sound like a bunch of random, unrelated guitar wanks thrown together.



that's why it's called technical death metal ;)



For the most part most tech bands suck, but I think these guys along with a few other bands pull it off pretty well

SepticReAnimate
March 7th 2010


190 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

nup. I love some tech death, like Decapitated and Psycroptic, for example.



30 posts in and we're still getting this bullshit?



And to that jackass, suck it. I wasn't aware that people were supposed to stop voicing their opinion after a number of posts.

SepticReAnimate
March 7th 2010


190 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

lmfao, well you can bitch all you want... still "wank" to me.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy