Album Rating: 2.0

nono, i meant that literally -- did they fix the glitch that didn't allow questionr marrks to be putr in reviewsr?

Album Rating: 5.0

I think so.

Album Rating: 3.5

nick butler lol

Album Rating: 4.5

I love looking at shit like Abdullah Ibrahim's WATER FROM AN ANCIENT WELL (1986) and seeing that Iai 1.5

Album Rating: 3.5

"can we put '?'s on reviews again yet?"



I had a couple on my last

Album Rating: 2.0

now that's a life of luxury

Album Rating: 3.5

It did feel like I had transcended a barrier, of sorts

Album Rating: 5.0

Ad revenue really payed off.

Maybe next we can shoot for asterisks and exclamation points

Album Rating: 3.5

You tempt the gods' wrath with such insolence.

Album Rating: 5.0

Or paid staff, that'd be nice.

Album Rating: 4.5

we're about to seize the means, jeremy

Album Rating: 4.5

why do certain reviews have ghost pages

Album Rating: 5.0

lack of ad revenue

IIRC, thanks to sput’s stoneage coding, moderator-removed messages still count toward that thread’s post count and thus end up creating empty annex pages if the total number would have indeed went to a new page (or several).

Album Rating: 4.5

that rules

Album Rating: 3.5

The Nirvana baby would tell you to sue.

Album Rating: 3.5

"IIRC, thanks to sput’s stoneage coding, moderator-removed messages still count toward that thread’s post count and thus end up creating empty annex pages if the total number would have indeed went to a new page (or several)."



based

Album Rating: 5.0

So we shall comment until we fix it.



Edit: I'm a genius.

"IIRC, thanks to sput’s stoneage coding, moderator-removed messages still count toward that thread’s post count and thus end up creating empty annex pages if the total number would have indeed went to a new page (or several)."
not sure if this still applies to present day deletions or, say, the Ulcerate thread would have at least 3-4 pages of limbo hmm