Album Rating: 4.0
Jesus christ, just wack a 2.5 on this and leave me be.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
good idea
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Poor Pleb. But Sputnik needs an overly biased review from you!
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Calm down Pleb, none of those points necessarily equate to this being average.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Hehe I jest JT.
Tbh I can acknowledge peoples problems with this, could easily see how some of the things Opeth have experimented with on this record would drive someone away.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
akerfeldts vox being the main one in my eyes
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Damn I actually like his vocals here
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
This is way better than Heritage.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Pfft, If you say so Hawks.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Hawks, never change < 3 m/ m/ m/
|
| |
that's not saying a whole lot since heritage sucks hawks but yeah i totally agree
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
slightly less mediocre is more appropriate
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
I like Heritage, but it's no more than a 3.5 for me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Tbh I can acknowledge peoples problems with this, could easily see how some of the things Opeth have experimented with on this record would drive someone away.
I don't really think the 'experimentation' (if you can call it that) on this will turn many people away as they played it fairly safe compared to Heritage. In some ways Mikael catered for many of those fans who were put off by Heritage by putting the focus back on melody and going for more of a solid structure musically.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
The orchestral elements are certainly experimental.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
@Pleb: For Opeth yeah. Hardly likely to alienate fans though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
The orchestral elements are certainly experimental.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
http://pitchfork.com/advance/519-pale-communion/
Now cap, now!
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
jac :D
|
| |
Definitely dig Heritage way more than this
|
| |
|
|
