can you please take us through that conclusion in detail because it makes no fucking sense (((((((((((((((((TO ME))))))))))))))

man I'm on literal fire

hihihihi

Album Rating: 3.5

People are saying Thales has his head up his ass, but I think it's gone so far that he has his neck and shoulders up there too by this point

Album Rating: 1.0

1. There is no agreed upon definition of vaporwave.

2. There is no distinction between vaporwave and sound collage other than the choice of samples used.

3. There are no musical or conceptual qualities in vaporwave that cannot be found in other genres of music.

4. To qualify as a genre of music, vaporwave must have an agreed upon definition, be shown to be distinctive from sound collage and have unique musical and conceptual qualities.

C: Therefore, vaporwave is not a real genre of music.



Case closed.

Album Rating: 3.5

Ok, he has his arms up there too

Case reopened.

Album Rating: 4.5

MichaelJordan is that you?

Album Rating: 1.0

its just vaporwave guyz no need to be all rambo and shit

Ihihihihihi rrrraaammbboo

1. There is no agreed upon definition of vaporwave.
2. There is no distinction between vaporwave and sound collage other than the choice of samples used.
3. There are no musical or conceptual qualities in vaporwave that cannot be found in other genres of music.
4. To qualify as a genre of music, vaporwave must have an agreed upon definition, be shown to be distinctive from sound collage and have unique musical and conceptual qualities.
C: Therefore, vaporwave is not a real genre of music.

Case closed.

Album Rating: 2.5

Thales what the heck are you taking about.

Album Rating: 1.0

Your version of my argument is simplistic and doesn't work because there is no entailment. Of course

this debate isn't over, but I've presented my case as a syllogism to make it easy for you dummies.

Address my premises individually, please.

exactly

man the genre concept doesn't follow sense it follows common sense it's two entirely different things
your approach is not only pathetic at best it's also the completely wrong one you might wanna channel
your energy towards something useful like getting a cute girl as your avatar or something hope you
feel me fam

omg

i sometimes wish i wasnt as autistic and socially resmarted man i would almost be decent at getting my point across

Album Rating: 1.0

My argument:



1. Not p.

2. Not q.

3. Not r.

4. If p, q and r then s.

C: Not s.



It's logically perfect and if my premises cannot be disputed it is a sound argument. Your version:



1. x is not y

2. z is y.



There is no conclusion and it is a lazy representation of my position.

Album Rating: 2.5

lol propositional logic won't get you anywhere musically

p, q, r => s does not imply not p, not q, not r => not s