will.i.am #Willpower
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Storm In A Teacup
April 21st 2013


47081 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Yes we do

Storm In A Teacup
April 21st 2013


47081 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

God damnit Kripes it's not your turn

Killerline
April 21st 2013


1 Comments


This is a really excellent review, thank you for the laughs.

TMobotron
April 21st 2013


7253 Comments


We really don't need .1 increments. Some of you might want them but everything has been just fine for years on .5 increments.

anarchistfish
April 21st 2013


30534 Comments


I wouldn't use them outside of review scores

funny how as soon as they're suggested, everyone suddenly wants them. no one gave a shit before

TheRapReviewer
April 21st 2013


9 Comments


dafuq

toxin.
April 21st 2013


13043 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

"Lol. Do you guys realize how easy it is to make sure that people aren't rating stuff ridiculous numbers? Even at the laziest, all they need to do is write a couple lines of code"



Yeah you're right but that hasn't stopped them from overreacting before (see: user "abuse" of a loophole means we'll never get 0.1 ratings). Though to be fair, I have a hunch MX never wanted to implement 0.1 ratings for users anyways (there's no real benefit to him in terms of user traffic and it probably hurts him financially because bigger serverload = more money for servers) and now he has a (bad) excuse why.



I think you guys are right about rating 0.5 though. And even if they didn't approve (srsly tho, just fix your lazy coding then) they can delete individual ratings so

treeqt.
April 21st 2013


16970 Comments


ok maybe we don't NEED .1 increments but damn I WANT them.

YankeeDudel
April 21st 2013


9342 Comments


i still think .1 increments are dumb as hell. the most we should need are .25

anything more than that is just really unnecessary to me.

treeqt.
April 21st 2013


16970 Comments


oh yeah .25 would be sweet too

bach
April 21st 2013


16922 Comments


He put an actual hash-tag in the title of his album. And you guy still thought this might be interesting?

YankeeDudel
April 21st 2013


9342 Comments


I mean what the hell is the difference between a 3.6 and 3.7? Hmmmmm. I could see .25 being useful for those many albums I think are in between a 3.5 and 4 or 4 and 4.5 etc. But I cant be fucked to rate with .1 increments it just seems so stupid.

gryndstone
April 21st 2013


2976 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

this album almost made me cry

treeqt.
April 21st 2013


16970 Comments


Ye .1 might be too much I don't know.
But I have soooooo many 4s that are so far apart from each other while not being 3.5s or 4.5s either.

demigod!
April 21st 2013


49662 Comments


who thought this would be interesting?

cuz they r really dum

YoYoMancuso
Emeritus
April 21st 2013


19776 Comments


album is most likely butthole

YankeeDudel
April 21st 2013


9342 Comments


yea thats why .25 just seems to be the best option tree so lets add it to the petition for jom.

YoYoMancuso
Emeritus
April 21st 2013


19776 Comments


how are people doing 0.5's without writing reviews

demigod!
April 21st 2013


49662 Comments


truth power

treeqt.
April 21st 2013


16970 Comments


yea thats why .25 just seems to be the best option tree so lets add it to the petition for jom.


noted!



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy