Taking Back Sunday Taking Back Sunday
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
astrel
June 27th 2011


2615 Comments


Thomas Pynchon > James Joyce. Deal with it.

Electric City
June 27th 2011


15756 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

one of these days ill finish gravity's rainbow

sexualsoybean
June 27th 2011


931 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I enjoyed "The crying of lot 49" immensely and "Vineland" was good as well. Ive also read "Dubliners" and "portrait of the artist" by joyce and I think they are both great authors but pychon gets kind of grating with all the california hippie stuff sometimes imo.

Crymsonblaze
June 27th 2011


8232 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Joyce is actually pretty great

Japandroid
June 27th 2011


139 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

WAY too wordy. Reads more like a childish rant than a review. Hate to say it, but this is extremely amateurish.




Hate to say I told you so.



Also, I'm upping this to a 5. First time listening while on the road tonight and it feels just so fuckin' awesome.

Knott-
Emeritus
June 27th 2011


10259 Comments


Someone agreed with you therefore you're right Japandroid?

But wait, I disagree. What does that mean? PARADOX!

You remind me of TheGoddamnBatman. That's not a compliment.

theacademy
Staff Reviewer
June 27th 2011


31878 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

omg thats even funnier because its scorpionstan

Japandroid
June 27th 2011


139 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I thought the consensus was that this is a very childish rant dressed as a review.



I don't give a fuck if you're defending your staff reviewer, man. Even before I joined here there were people complaining, even staff members.



Stop being such an ass kisser, Dwight. It's kinda sad how much obvious you are.

Satellite
June 27th 2011


26539 Comments


It's kinda sad how much obvious you are. [2]


ScorpionStan
June 27th 2011


1912 Comments


dont know what children you read but you'll have to hook me up to the wordy ones

I said it reads like a childish rant. If you want to be hooked up with examples, this site is a literal breeding ground of both wordy reviews AND childish rants, so you're in the right place to look. I know you said a few pages back you don't read many reviews on here, so that would explain your ignorance.

theacademy
Staff Reviewer
June 27th 2011


31878 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

It's kinda sad how much obvious you are. [3]




Hate to say I told you so.

omnipanzer
June 27th 2011


21827 Comments


Just gonna repeat this cause its made me loz

It's kinda sad how much obvious you are. [3]

omnipanzer
June 27th 2011


21827 Comments


[4]

Knott-
Emeritus
June 27th 2011


10259 Comments


Yeah I've noticed you tend to think of your opinion as a consensus.

ScorpionStan
June 27th 2011


1912 Comments


All i'm saying is this: the tag of "staff reviewer" comes with certain standards and expectations.
This review doesn't even come close to meeting them.

I know for a fact you can do better Adam, this review is simply beneath you. That's why i was
disappointed.

Knott-
Emeritus
June 27th 2011


10259 Comments


I disagree and think, as I said on page 1, that this is one of the best reviews I've read in months.

toxin.
June 27th 2011


13043 Comments


If a review's job is to persuade (or conversely, dissuade) the reader from listening to a particular album, then this review succeeded, as I don't plan on ever listening to this (by virtue of the review, mind you, as it was persuasive enough to do its job).

Japandroid
June 27th 2011


139 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I'd like to notice again that not only reads like a childish rant, he got the lyrics of the only song he quoted wrong. Also, he says the song has christian motifs because there's the word savior in the title.



This is like saying that El Paso is about the city. But yeah, there's no room to criticism here, just ass kissing.

toxin.
June 27th 2011


13043 Comments


^The fact that no one is criticizing this particular review does not mean that we're ass kissing. It's possible that the review is, in fact, good. I've seen many Sputnik regulars (far more active than I am, anyways) criticize staff reviews, but perhaps this particular album does not warrant criticism.

Japandroid
June 27th 2011


139 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

And that, xtoxin, it's a shame. Amazing record. If I"d actually review on this, I'd give it a 4.5/5, since I'm not, it's getting a 5.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy