Album Rating: 4.0
So two songs that came out when this album was probably already finished... and a song that doesn't sound anything like all candy, perfect
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Translation: "Damn you gave me 3 solid examples, I'ma move goalposts now"
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Translation: "I listened to this album once, gave it a 3, called it a day"
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
*4 times, going on 5. Still sounding like a solid 3.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
People keep comparing these guys to ETID.
Yo Jeet, give me one ETID track like Echo and Dust Pt1.
I'll wait.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.3
bands are not real
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
By the way, listened to this 3 times and it seems to live up to what I expected.
Can't wait to listen some more. I smiled like a donkey when the first track started rolling.
So happy.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
The quiet shakes and a painful and necessary action are my first listen. Standouts
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
"People keep comparing these guys to ETID.
Yo Jeet, give me one ETID track like Echo and Dust Pt1."
Dont need to lil mama. We all know these guys are doing ETID worship. They got some He Is Legend sprinkled in too. Its ok to admit one of your favorite bands is running with other band's styles.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
...I hear more Norma Jean than anything else
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
...and I hear more late career Dillinger than anything else
And I feel like if everyone is constantly bringing up different bands these guys are supposedly stealing from... maybe its because they've taken influence from a variety of different bands to create their own sound? Just like any other band?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Yeah that’s kind of what I’m getting at, and I like Sowing’s description too, they’re a more melodic ETID. They’re not ripping anyone off.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Comparing bands and albums is what a lot of threads boil down to now. It's always "x is better than y". Like I get it, its a music discussion site. But man, can't people just enjoy some good songs without nitpicking every little negative detail? It's like some people don't even try to enjoy music anymore, they just wanna critique it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Jay’s spitting all fax no printer
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Had to be said brother
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Jay saying what I've been thinking. Why I wain off threads is because of that BS. I also don't get why one new release isn't "good" because another is better. I really enjoy Monuments new record, but I prefer this one. Thing is, that doesn't make that record turn to shit. Or the BS that this is a "worse version of ETID" because they ARE NOT ETID.
Part of me wishes I didn't even mention ETID on this review because it wasn't about comparison. It was only about the fact that this is the first big southern metal release in a post-ETID. Trying to ask or answer the question: Can Greyhaven take a bigger piece of the pie now that the king is gone? Not if Greyhaven is better.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Also, my other big issue on this thread is people dropping 4's and 4.5's and going "All Candy sucks". Like dude, I could only name a handful of albums with a perfect tracklist. Why don't you tell me why the rest of the album is incredible in your eyes.
Note: Not a dig to the people dropping 3's and shit. Clearly the album is "good" to them, but not incredible.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
very hyped for this
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
yeah only thing is all candy rules. People really are fuckin tripping
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
yeah
|
| |
|
|
