Metallica Master Of Puppets
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Steerpike
January 25th 2007


1861 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

i wasnt trying to convince anyone of anything. I was just simply saying what i thought.




But what was the point? I guarantee you that you could take those exact words and stick them in the comment box of any negative review of any album, and it would still look equally retarded.

camo_barker
January 27th 2007


15 Comments


I found a band that has some Metallica elements to it...the sound quality is pretty shitty tho

www.myspace.com/vorader

Bfhurricane
January 27th 2007


6284 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

There are 10,000 bands with metallica elements to it, don't spend time here promoting unknown bands

Bfhurricane
January 27th 2007


6284 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Warpath, just give up. I've spent way too many hours arguing over how great this album is. Just face the fact that people don't like thrash.

Steerpike
January 27th 2007


1861 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Just face the fact that people don't like thrash.


Or they don't like this album. It can't be that hard to imagine.

ASberg
March 22nd 2007


2161 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Ok review, you get my vote. I love this album and pretty much dissagree(wtf?)with you on almost every point. But all this talk about you having "balls" confuses me a bit. To me it's not "ballsy" to post this on the internet, i mean who would stop you?

It's ballsy to do this as a speech before a metallica consert



And i almost feel it's trendy to hate metallica today(even though it isnt), anyone else?





wakeupdead
March 22nd 2007


2229 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

And i almost feel it's trendy to hate metallica today(even though it isnt), anyone else?
I'd say its trendy on this site to hate St. Anger and it almost seems like sometimes people say they hate it so people will like them. I like St. Anger though.

rockstar18
March 22nd 2007


741 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I thought St.Anger would have been a decent enough album if their were a few guitar solos and no tinny sounding drums. The album had the riffs they just lacked the two points I just mentioned.

ASberg
March 22nd 2007


2161 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I like St. Anger as it is even thought it's not near there older albums. Im one of those people that like them doin different stuff...that sounded weird...

ZFighter142
March 22nd 2007


205 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I agree st anger could have been a little better if it did have solos, and real drum sounds...but there was way more then that...hetfields voice sounded like crap...and well the way of the songs sounded just sounded below average.

ToWhatEnd
March 22nd 2007


3173 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I found a band that has some Metallica elements to it...
Fooled me, I thought for sure you'd say Trivium.

Altmer
March 22nd 2007


5714 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

all of a sudden it's trendy to hate Trivium too

Steerpike
March 22nd 2007


1861 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

It's not as if they don't bring it on themselves.

Altmer
March 23rd 2007


5714 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

still doesn't mean you have to hate 'em ;)

TheHamburgerman
March 23rd 2007


1546 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Or maybe a load of people just happens to hate that album, many people have arguments to back up their rating.

Altmer
March 23rd 2007


5714 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

that's a much better reason

Steerpike
March 23rd 2007


1861 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

still doesn't mean you have to hate 'em




But I do. Their music fucking sucks.This Message Edited On 03.23.07

wakeupdead
March 23rd 2007


2229 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Their music fucking sucks
I think someone on the site said this before, but if The Crusade was a Metallica album the rating would be much much higher.

Otisbum
March 23rd 2007


1913 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

but if The Crusade was a Metallica album the rating would be much much higher.
That's because it can't get much lower.

And because since Metallica hasn't put out a metal album since their s/t, people would be happy to see one, and some would end up over-rating it.

wakeupdead
March 23rd 2007


2229 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

That's because it can't get much lower.



And because since Metallica hasn't put out a metal album since their s/t, people would be happy to see one, and some would end up over-rating it.
I'd say St. Anger qualifies as metal. And it really can't get too much lower i guess :lol:



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy