Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
As if you've ever had any.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
"how no one mentions goon squad or graphic nature is completely beyond me."
those songs gave me bed bugs while I was sleeping on potsy's spoke-riddled tandem bike. boooooooring.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
"As if you've ever had any"
oh ok. you're projecting your anger towards me, and that's alright. It's ok, most kids your age have never tasted the copper
flavor of pussy. the problem is, you should be trying to score, not having your feelings hurt just because of some guy that
quoted "Liar Liar" (twice in the same week) made an off the cuff comment on the internet. I'm completely convinced that
you're fat now. way to go.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Also took you some to time to think of an answer eh?
|
| |
is this repetitive?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
nah
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
are you fat?
youtellme ;)
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Are fat people normally circumcised? I've never asked anyone face to face...
I bet it looks like the fat hat my pug wears when I move her skin ontop of her forehead. but then she has dick cheese oozing out.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
AW TOOK YOU SOME TIME TO ANSWER LOL 8=D SUPERBAD IS MY FAVORITE MOVIE
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
jk you're probably a fine young man. I've had several fat friends in my day. wanna 5 this mediocre bullshit together? It's kinda like having a wingman on sputnik
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I bet recspecs would include you in a foursome, so long as you high five him while double penetrating
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
but you have to PROMISE
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Seems like the review is calling this a 2.5 -just- because they didn't try to be super inventive w/ the song structures this time around. The review really doesn't make any other substantial points at all, other than vaguely calling it "soulless" (oh, and the reviewer is seemingly the only person in the universe who thinks Chino's voice is bad/forced.)
The songs - while not super inventive - are mostly quite good, and improve on some of the areas/emotions they've done before. I think it's quite ok to retread familiar paths if you improve the experience.
Anyway, for a staff reviewer to rate a highly-rated album by a super-respected band this low, they should probably have more behind it than just "the song structures aren't too varied".
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Recspecs cannot be left hanging.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
"Anyway, for a staff reviewer to rate a highly-rated album by a super-respected band this low, they should probably have more behind it than just "the song structures aren't too varied"."
for them. good bands that put out mediocore albums are more likely to be scored lower. get naked.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
In the end its all about taste... (Hell, I gave ObZen a 2.5, and Immersion a 5.0, I admit my music taste is shit) If it really bothers people that much that someone dislikes this, then they shouldn't be on review sites in the first place.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Hell, I gave ObZen a 2.5, and Immersion a 5.0, I admit my music taste is shit
Going against the general consensus does not invalidate or degrade your opinion's worth.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Plus so long as you lay it down with sense, your opinion will never be any less valid than the pack.
Music(or really art in general) is like that; Some people will reject something for the very same reasons others will embrace it.
|
| |
|
|