Album Rating: 3.5
" There might exist SOMEbody that likes screeching noises and nonsense patterns,"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neLKgSdrch8
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
there might be some people that say they're favorite painting is looseleaf paper shredded and spit on, you know?
It's called avant-garde, get with the program!
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Hahah
Younger generations are spoiled and lazy is what it is. Artistic means nothing anymore because we've gotten so philosophic to make it mean 'anything'
|
| |
Picture made the thread worthwhile again.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
Taylorrrrr
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
[img]http://blogs.phillyburbs.com/news/bcct/wp-content/blogs.dir/2/files/2008/May/Tuesday/taylor_swift.jpg[/img]
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
ahhhhhhhhh
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
not as good as the sexy black dress, but i like the realism
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Set As Desktop Background
'd
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
there are standards for what constitutes music as being good, bad, and mediocre.
rules of melody, rhythm, and dynamics
and yeah, that "emotion" crap :-)
THANK YOU.
under you people's (Waior's, robertsona's, klap4music's) logic, i could pick up my acoustic guitar, pluck 2 open strings over and over in the same repetitious pattern for 3 minutes, and be completely justified in saying that my song was as good as any song ever written by Eric Clapton, Stevie Ray Vaughan, The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Radiohead, Thrice, Brand New, -- you get my point. if there's absolutely no standard, that would be a completely legitimate statement for me to make.
the problem is: that statement is utterly ridiculous and demonstrably false. all you have to do is listen to any song by any of the artists mentioned (or any number of other artists) to know how stupid that argument is.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
^ Exactly
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
yes i know that channing, and all i'm saying is that it's obviously a flawed argument.
my aforementioned hypothetical two-note song may sound absolutely stunning to my ears, but it's obviously not anywhere near the musical quality of, say, a song by Radiohead. yet with your logic, i would be justified in saying that it was just as good?!? that isn't even rational.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Bloody hell, I read through those last 5-6 pages that were new since last night. Thanks FUK for those two pictures, made it totally worth while.
Album is 5.5/5, pushing 6. BOOM!
|
| |
yet with your logic, i would be justified in saying that it was just as good?!?
You would be justified in saying you think that it's good. Which would be your opinion. Now hush up.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
well obviously, i can think whatever i want. but would i be justified in saying it is that good?
|
| |
Well, that's a matter of opinion.
well obviously, i can think whatever i want.
Look! You got the point! Yay!
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
FUCK FUCK FUCK OH MY FUCK MY BOYFRIEND'S BACK
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
haha nice try dude, but that wasn't the point.
the point is this: you're claiming that there's absolutely no objective standard by which to say that a Radiohead song from Kid A or OK Computer is better than 2 open notes plucked in the same repetitious pattern for 5 minutes on my acoustic guitar. that's what you have to defend.
|
| |
haha this thread only gets more interesting
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
^ i could say you just basically proved my point Hanson (by what standard is it "too extreme?"), but i'll be kind.
exactly how is it too extreme? it's my "song" versus another song, straight up. i think mine is just as good, so prove to me why it isn't.
|
| |
|
|
![http://blogs.phillyburbs.com/news/bcct/wp-content/blogs.dir/2/files/2008/May/Tuesday/taylor_swift.jpg[/img]](http://blogs.phillyburbs.com/news/bcct/wp-content/blogs.dir/2/files/2008/May/Tuesday/taylor_swift.jpg[/img]){kind=link}