Album Rating: 3.0
'Ngl that tec rating is so transparently optical' (2)
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Eh, we know what you're saying with that 3.0. And frankly it's not a good look.
|
| |
Iiiiiiiii see fire in the dead mans eye
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
3.0 is the Demon default for "I have no idea if I actually like this or not..."
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Nah, usually it’s ‘I like this somewhat and / or it has potential’ … I’m a rampant 2.5er for shit I’m unsure of (now at least, probably got some historic 3s of the ilk you’re referring to, but this was relatively recent).
|
| |
New year, new optics
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Help me Pots, I’m going through an identity crisis. Where do I place my bets?
|
| |
Im personally quote partial to the aesthetic of rating in only 1s and 5s as opaquely as possible
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
That’s not the sort of world I ever want to live in
|
| |
Who the fuck wants to live in a world where everything is a 3
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Not everything. Helps keep me grounded tho.
|
| |
3 is literally the worst rating
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
oh fuck this was my 3500th rating how does this impact the optics
|
| |
u look like a mug and always have/will
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Makes me want to hunt fish with my hands.
|
| |
Racist optics
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
It's more geographical innit?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
topological album moment
|
| |
“It's more geographical innit?”
If you want to edit that comment to say “handline fishing” then sure
|
| |
But as far as I’m aware the Bahamas aren’t known for good hand fishing…?
|
| |
|
|
