as is evident in 16 pages
|
| |
Yeah, why are we even talking about that anymore? This album shows that JFAC have moved away and have become a straight up Death Metal band.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
They were tight and heavy as hell at Download.
I wish people would stop connecting JFAC to the "trendy" kids who listen to the band to appear hardcore.
a) Scene kids are retarded.
b) Genesis is a quality album, shows just how much potential each member of this band possesses.
c) I agree with hottiebassplayer, so should you.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
NO, this album is a transition between death metal and metalcore. I will seriously give anyone who brings up the whole genre thing an internet slap. THERE IS NO one answer, come to realize that.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
I'm not a JFAC hater, I actually like Doom a lot, but I don't see how this album deserves any higher than 2.5. I've listened to the cd a few times now and the songs sound so much alike from each other, I can barely tell them apart. Some of this cd is pretty cool, and then the rest just bores me. The guitar riffs are repetitive and not even that great.
|
| |
NO, this album is a transition between death metal and metalcore. I will seriously give anyone who brings up the whole genre thing an internet slap. THERE IS NO one answer, come to realize that Why don't you come to realize what you just said is incorrect and carries no weight? No where on this album is their any hardcore influence. End of story, thread closed.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Stop the arguing (or at least minimize it) about the genre and just vote on the review
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
crappy band, good review. nuff said
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
2.5 isn't crappy, it's neutral. Unless this is the most tolerable release of the band for you in which case then I understand.
|
| |
I voted, now stop telling me to stop arguing and start helping me shut this fool down, because he's wrong.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Eh, I've already shared my opinion im multiple paragraphs but if you want a shorter one I hear metal, death metal and some metalcore in this.
|
| |
Edit: too easy, nevermindThis Message Edited On 06.15.07
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
2.5 isn't crappy, it's neutral. Unless this is the most tolerable release of the band for you in which case then I understand.
It is the most tolerable. I could rate it lower but when I compare it to Doom I think 2.5 is fitting... for now.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
jfac used to be scene. and theyre like trying to leave the scene. they bree'd there way to the top and they cut their hair grew beards and got looser jeans. also on genesis there arent really breakdowns. its more progressive than there old stuff. i personally like there old stuff better but there still a good band to see live and theyll probably get better. they used to be the scenest band ever, up there with bring me the horizon, and now theyre just metal.
nice review by the way.
|
| |
Now their just new school DM.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
aka 'wannabe' Death Metal :D
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
there should be more lead fills on this and stuff
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
aka 'wannabe' Death Metal not all modern DM is wannabe... Behemoth (they're modern DM because they weren't DM until the turn of the century), The Faceless, Origin, and a whole mess of others are all great bands, they just show progression from what DM used to be.
JFAC is really only an "ok" band, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that they're wannabes.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
theyre barely death metal
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
It's not that they aren't "tr00 DM!", it's just that they're far from anything original and aren't anything that experienced listeners will care to listen to multiple times.
Barely death metal, heh,
|
| |
|
|
