Refused The Shape Of Punk To Come
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
KILL
November 7th 2016


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

check husker du XD

Futures
Contributing Reviewer
November 7th 2016


17288 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

more like husker poo XD

KILL
November 7th 2016


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

dude at least check em before callin them homos



they shaped the sound of punk to come!!!!!!!!!!

DarkSideOfLucca
November 7th 2016


19182 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

thought that was good charlotte?

Cygnatti
November 7th 2016


36399 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

this is closer "art punk" than "experimental punk", if we're being nitpicky

in any case, i think you'd dig

Rowhaus
November 30th 2016


7284 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

good album I think

Artuma
November 30th 2016


32828 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

extremely good

onionbubs
November 30th 2016


23796 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

yea its alright

wham49
November 30th 2016


6359 Comments


I gave this a first listen a week ago, it is good, but not the behemoth it is portrayed as, if this came out in 77-81 it would have been just another punk album

wham49
November 30th 2016


6359 Comments


it is good though

Artuma
November 30th 2016


32828 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

"if this came out in 77-81 it would have been just another punk album"



the fuck?

wham49
November 30th 2016


6359 Comments


yes you heard it right,

guitarded_chuck
November 30th 2016


18070 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

yeah that makes literally zero sense



it was extremely progressive for a punk album even when it came out let alone if it came out 20 years earlier lol



people would have been like "alright you fucking swedes wheres your time machine"

Chortles
November 30th 2016


21494 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I don't even like this but that's kind of a goofy thing to say

Artuma
November 30th 2016


32828 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

nice dig chortles, love that album



and exactly what chuck said

wham49
November 30th 2016


6359 Comments


wrong guys, I'll give it another listen but doesnt do that much for me after the first listen

and progressive punk is an oxymoron, punk is the polar opposite of progressive, if it is progressive must be something other than punk

onionbubs
November 30th 2016


23796 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"and progressive punk is an oxymoron, punk is the polar opposite of progressive, if it is progressive must be something other than punk"



Wow

Artuma
November 30th 2016


32828 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

not progressive as in progressive rock of course



they were progressive in the sense that they incorporated highly unusual elements for hardcore punk in their music and pushed forward the limits of the genre. they weren't the first ones to do it but in 77-81 they most certainly would've been (i mean, hxc was just being invented back then)

guitarded_chuck
November 30th 2016


18070 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

yeah at its core and originally punk was just about raw energy and anti-establishment/tradition but it morphed into lots of things, pop punk, post punk, hardcore, post hardcore, etc etc



if punk couldnt be progressive every subsequent release would take step backwards until it was literally just one note of ambient noise and or nothing at all ya dig



its like if you say metalcore isnt metal, well then how do you define metal, is it only iron maiden or some shit

guitarded_chuck
November 30th 2016


18070 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

these guys arent traditional punk and in fact they are p unique, i think, but if you had to label them itd be post hardcore punk



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy