You’ve summed up the last 20yrs beautifully
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
glitch pop = not real
vaporwave = real
do you see
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
@zak, lmaooo honestly, you're not entirely wrong.
@love, 100% correct yes :]
|
| |
"You’ve summed up the last 20yrs beautifully"
"no historical precedent"
I wish. It is harder for me to find landmark almost tabula rasa like albums these days.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
At this point I've given up trying to classify music with shite/useless labels, it is what it is
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
the use of doing so for me is just discovering other artists and general music discussion like is currently happening in this thread, i usually take any genre description with a grain of salt and often enjoy the discourse even if i don’t agree
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
the use of doing so is discovering other artists [2]
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
the use of doing so is that you can tell ppl the album they like is not in fact the obscure genre they think it is but rather a different obscure genre altogether
|
| |
rec me your favorite Skweee releases fam
https://rateyourmusic.com/genre/Skweee/
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
real?
|
| |
From what I've seen is discussions it is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XIV5-axhFM
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
‘the use of doing so is discovering other artists‘ [3]
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
the use of doing so is to confuse people who have no clue what they are [4]
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
im trash
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I’m definitely confused ngl.
|
| |
go pick it up, take them lights away
|
| |
"From what I can tell Glitch pop is just pop that has glitch effects. It's not a consistent genre with any tradition or lineages"
Semi-disagreed with this because most of the earlier (late 90s thru mid 00s) stuff associated with glitch pop is basically an off-shoot of indietronica even though there was no scene driving it. Contemp stuff tagged as glitch pop is a far more mixed bag, but also hardly less unhelpful as a label than, say, art pop or electro pop
Is it a genre? Probs no (and not anymore if it ever was). Is it real? Ehhhh
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YmNK8R-YuEc
|
| |
I haven't listened to 99% of them and they could be tagged wrong, from the rym charts 44/156 glitch pop releases from 2000-2005 have an indietronica vote. So maybe you are right. But Indietronica is another confused mess that is probably overused so maybe not.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Electropop is very real, highly documented, and easily distinguished (i.e. electropop =/= "electronic pop" or "pop with electronic influences").
It has to be, considering that it was at a time, the single most successful subgenre in all of radio (in America). I won't argue that 'glitch pop' isn't a useful descriptor, of course, it could very well be.
Art pop, however, has its own issues (and let's not get started with 'art rock').
|
| |
|
|