Album Rating: 3.5
"With Damnation, it certainly proved"
yeh man thats the bit, reads much better now
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Love this album! I think if akerfeldt had released this as a solo or side project, everyone would be praising it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
basically
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off
I want Akerfeldt to release an acoustic solo project, that would be great
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
Great review and bravo! for feature. Little mistakes here and there:
''definitely take [the] home the awards for''
'' “Faith in Others” give[s] the listener ''
'' Unfortunately, those how [who] disliked Heritage ''
Don't know if they've been mentioned before, didn't read 14 pages of comments... I adore new Opeth but would like to see a heavier record from them next time, too.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off
Mikael's in love with this new sound, so I doubt that would happen but one can dream...
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Thanks dude! Ill correct that stuff.
And yes people have mentioned but yea I'd enjoy a heavier record too.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
There's still quite a few bits that need editing in this review, Mongi.
for example:
While they band may not have completely missed it
but his harmonies get quite better as the song goes on.
^Not sure if that one's a typo but it's bad grammar.
However, the band’s desire to make the album feel dated will undeniably be a gamble for them and for those who loved Heritage may even love Pale Communion. Unfortunately, those who disliked Heritage will most likely expect the same reaction.
I'm not sure what it is you're trying to say with this. It doesn't really make any sense to me.
Not trying to be overly nit-picky but as this is the featured review it would be nice to think that this is the best out of all the PC reviews so far, which it could well be if it wasn't for the mistakes/occasional awkward wording.
|
| |
this albm is fuking shit
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
haha prob
|
| |
As of now, Opeth are suck in the '70s
that's either a typo or a diss to the 70s
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Album fucking sucks. Really sad how far this band has fallen since Ghost Reveries.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off
*since Watershed
|
| |
this album got like 4 great songs and the rest are ok.. not shit or amazing.. just ok..
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
@emyay umm it's neither? It's just a statement.
@jamie what I mean is how if people didn't like heritage, they'll not like this from my point of view. I'll fix that stuff you pointed out later too. The beauty of not having an editor is how you often miss things even when you proofread a lot.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
I'm not a big fan if Heritage, but like this. More accessible I guess
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
heritage >> this
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Sorry for the typos people, I'll fix those when I get one from work later.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
@jamie what I mean is how if people didn't like heritage, they'll not like this from my point of view.
Right ok I think I get that, still reads very awkwardly to me though. To me it would make more sense if you said something like:
"However, the band’s desire to make the album feel dated will undeniably be a gamble for them but those who loved Heritage will quite likely love Pale Communion. Unfortunately, those who disliked Heritage will most likely have similar feelings towards this"
I'll fix that stuff you pointed out later too. The beauty of not having an editor is how you often miss things even when you proofread a lot.
To be fair other reviews I've read from you haven't been littered with typos or awkward wording at all (at least not that I've noticed) so don't take it as a negative towards you as a reviewer, I like your reviews a lot :]
|
| |
|
|
