Mumford and Sons Sigh No More
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
CrackwhoreBatshit
July 10th 2011


95 Comments


You stay for the distaste, but you leave cause of the banjo

Aids
July 10th 2011


24948 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

it was a 3.7 before the news article exploded into a heated discussion



it was a 3.6 before Knott's review



it is now a 3.5



.2 isn't a huge drop but it's a big enough drop in a week to be able to blame it on something other than the album simply growing off people

Aids
July 10th 2011


24948 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

oh what the fuck it's back up to 3.6 weird



still, most people here are mindless drones and you know it ali haha



I'm probably wrong about this one though idk

someguest
July 10th 2011


30519 Comments


You just need the PROOF.

Did you fucking get it?


CrackwhoreBatshit
July 10th 2011


95 Comments


I'm gonna start smoking outta banjos, I'll find a way

Electric City
July 10th 2011


15756 Comments


okay to the people who are bitching about the "mindless drone" mentality of this website (sorry to call you out, Aids), but isn't it a testament to Knott's writing that he wrote an argument that is apparently convincing? When did we decide that we couldn't be influenced by another's opinion?

someguest
July 10th 2011


30519 Comments


nothing like dumb bitches thinkin' they're being artsy listening to this shit

o well

CrackwhoreBatshit
July 10th 2011


95 Comments


SHUT THE FUCK UP I agree with you

robertsona
Emeritus
July 10th 2011


28661 Comments


gona wathc so me fuckgijn daddy day camp up in htisht btichc MUMOFRD AND SNONS WOOOO

Electric City
July 10th 2011


15756 Comments


can you not try so hard like once

robertsona
Emeritus
July 10th 2011


28661 Comments


haha aadam downerrrrrrrrrrrrr

someguest
July 10th 2011


30519 Comments


standin' in the windoahhhhwah

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
July 10th 2011


32288 Comments


okay to the people who are bitching about the "mindless drone" mentality of this website (sorry to call you out, Aids), but isn't it a testament to Knott's writing that he wrote an argument that is apparently convincing? When did we decide that we couldn't be influenced by another's opinion?


I'm not saying that this isn't the case but you could also make the deduction that by having this album back in front page discussion (new review etc) that it's also reminded people to rate/change ratings

Electric City
July 10th 2011


15756 Comments


which is still not "oh now its cool to not like this/ i have no opinion of my own/ better rate down to raise my epeen/ herpity derpity"

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
July 10th 2011


32288 Comments


Or maybe their opinions just changed naturally?

Electric City
July 10th 2011


15756 Comments


my point is that the insinuation that now that knott ripped this to shreds that everyones rating it poorly to keep up appearances is dumb

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
July 10th 2011


32288 Comments


And my point is I don't think it's just that. But regardless, it is stupid

Electric City
July 10th 2011


15756 Comments


i see what you're sayin chan, but

someguest
July 10th 2011


30519 Comments


well said

Trebor.
Emeritus
July 10th 2011


60333 Comments


My sister likes these guys
Therefore I might



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy