Sylosis Edge of the Earth
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
PurpleDino
April 4th 2012


3839 Comments


possibly

thumbcrusher
April 4th 2012


3798 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i dunno, they seem capable of writing accopmlished songs pretty freely

Metalstyles
April 4th 2012


8576 Comments


Too soon?
In my opinion yes, but of course, that's mainly because I've given this only two full run-throughs. Also, I understand that these guys are talented and they want to show it, but they need to cut down on the song lengths. This album is way too long for its genre (and also gets repetitive thanks to it, I can tell that with great confidence even when I have listened to this only a couple of times). It should be at least 15 minutes shorter imo.

KILL
April 4th 2012


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

AGREED

PurpleDino
April 4th 2012


3839 Comments


Good points well made

bloc
April 5th 2012


70880 Comments


For sure. Song lengths are probably this band's biggest downfall.

KjSwantko
April 5th 2012


12568 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

yep, it's SHIT.

FuzzyWookie
April 8th 2012


152 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

SHIT it is not. Song lengths are fine in my opinion, but I am worried a little bit about this upcoming album.... If they make a huge leap, though, like they did from Conclusion of an Age to Edge of the Earth, I will be quite impressed.



[Insert criticism here] (v)

KILL
April 8th 2012


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

shit

The7thVermicide
April 8th 2012


925 Comments


Just few tracks present that problem but it not a big deal , for me the most complicated issue when I heard this albums for the first time was the Josh vocal work , Jamie Graham voice is better .

The7thVermicide
April 8th 2012


925 Comments


Jamie Graham voice is one of the reasons that put Conclusion Of The Age on my favorites .

The7thVermicide
April 8th 2012


925 Comments


That song is badass

KILL
April 8th 2012


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

flutter have you negged my review yet

FuzzyWookie
April 9th 2012


152 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Don't worry, I did. (^.^)

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
April 9th 2012


116819 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Lol 5 what a homo.

The7thVermicide
April 9th 2012


925 Comments


I don't consider these guys as the reborn of thrash metal ,but certainly these guys are very good on what they do and they made some solid modern metal works.

6justice6detty6
April 9th 2012


148 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

faggot band

XfingTheSullen
April 11th 2012


5581 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I like this shit so much more than the classic thrash metal. And i like recommending it to Trivium fans, so that they finally listen to something good.

JamieTwort
April 12th 2012


26988 Comments


You suck.

FuzzyWookie
April 13th 2012


152 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I'm a five just because this was one of the first real metal albums I got in to/ fell in love with. But crucify me if you must.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy