Nirvana In Utero
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
FR33L0RD
July 29th 2009


6400 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

musically poor

Titan50
July 29th 2009


4588 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

That's the whole point

shindip
July 29th 2009


3539 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

The instrumentation here isnt that bad at all.

AliW1993
July 29th 2009


7511 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Who cares how good it is instrumentally if the songs are really good. I'd rather listen to some crappy guitarist who can write amazing songs than someone wanking off his guitar but without any songwriting talent.

shindip
July 29th 2009


3539 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Sort of like Dragonforce and some folk singer person

handoman
July 29th 2009


2386 Comments


but the songs arent really good...

gaslightanthem
July 29th 2009


5208 Comments


but the songs arent really good...



Titan50
July 29th 2009


4588 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

but the songs are really good...





Noticed a few grammatical errors, fixed them for you

poopty
July 29th 2009


319 Comments


i think the main problem with this album is that it's quite the snooze fest i mean it's boring as fuck

Titan50
July 29th 2009


4588 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Scentless Apprentice is boring?

AliW1993
July 29th 2009


7511 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

i can kinda understand how people could find it boring, as none of it is as immediate as nevermind, but scentless apprentice and all apologies are two of my fav songs ever.

poopty
July 29th 2009


319 Comments


[quote=Titan50]Scentless Apprentice is boring?[/quote]

Yes

Titan50
July 29th 2009


4588 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I'd say it's more immediate as Nevermind, a lot more abrasive and in-your-face

MassiveAttack
July 29th 2009


2754 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I really adored this album when I was in high school. Its extremely raw and unadulterated. A lot more edgy then anything else they made and really helped me find other music at the time. I can probably thank this album for pretty much connecting me to a whole range of bands, even if they're no way related.

AliW1993
July 29th 2009


7511 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

nah, i didnt like in utero at first, but after repeated listenings i loved it. far better than nevermind imo (though i love that too).



edit: also agree with massiveattack's comment

Titan50
July 29th 2009


4588 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Probably the only thing that stops this being a 5 is Dumb and the lack of smooth flow inbetween songs. A weird gripe, I know, but I like songs to flow into one another

AliW1993
July 29th 2009


7511 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

i actually think it flows better than their other albums, its actually one of the reasons why i have it as a 5. i agree that dumb is one of the weaker songs, but i still like it.

Titan50
July 29th 2009


4588 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I actually edited the songs on iTunes so the gaps between songs were drastically changed, am I sad

handoman
July 29th 2009


2386 Comments


nvm...

poopty
July 29th 2009


319 Comments


[quote=Titan50]I actually edited the songs on iTunes so the gaps between songs were drastically changed, am I sad[/quote]

more than likely



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy