Album Rating: 3.5
@Mythodea I think you might be the only one who thinks that lol. Cheers dude
@Egarran yeah, but skill/technicality doesn't make an artist's music objectively good.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
No way dude!!! I'm totally with Mythodea. It's very cool!
Did an Art history minor during my Biology Bachelor. Totally love it.
Never underestimate the nerdiness of the Sput-crew.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
> skill/technicality doesn't make an artist's music objectively good.
I mean that if this was played by tone-deaf ten year olds, it would be an objectively worse piece of art.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
would it, though?
But, before that, it's different to compose a piece of music to be played in a certain way and then butchering it, and it's another thing completely to not rely on technical skills to write music.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
The human ear responds better to harmonic etc. sounds. That is how skill objectively improves music.
Maybe you mean opinions about art are subjective and that is correct.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
@Egarran I mean, it couldn't be played by tone deaf ten-year olds, but okay, I get your point. Skill as it relates to technicality and musicianship are important, but they're not "objective" measures of how good a piece of music. If that were true then all of Yngwie Malmsteen's albums would be masterpieces.
On the other hand, been thinking a bit about this whole idea of skill as an objective, and it does seem like a pretty decent one if applied broadly. Like, I guess anyone with a high level of skill when it comes to production, songwriting, musicianship, etc. would be expected to be more capable of making great music than someone without those skills - but even then I reckon there's a lot more to it. Like, someone with all those skills could probably make a technically "perfect," but also utterly soulless album.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pq_4KtPmyYY
|
| |
I recall this album is an enemy to those with a lisp
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
thorthereth
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Hahaha bloc that was amazing.
Whoa a 4.5 Tundra!
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Curry poison in your kiss
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
this was my first opeth album, no screams, no problem
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
... dude seriously the 'no screams' thing is a decade old, it so isn't about that anymore. Believe it or not but everyone has moved on. Most people dislike this one for so many different reasons.
I for one sometimes consider Heritage to be their best album. But this one is their worst. By far.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
dope
|
| |
>The human ear responds better to harmonic etc. sounds. That is how skill objectively improves music.
lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Yeah I'm not one of the guys pissed off about growls being gone. This album is just the most boring effort in their career
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
[2]
But sometimes I thinl better production could elevate this a huge bit tbh
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
"But sometimes I thinl better production could elevate this a huge bit tbh" for sure!
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Eh fail to see how it's boring, has consistent fast paced tempos, and when they're not its groovey as hell riffs like on the title track, a lot of shreddy solos too which is cool, only part I see that's boring is like, Seventh Sojourn, and I love that song cause it has such a cinematic vibe, feel like I'm traversing a vast desert whenever i listen to it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
I just only feel like half of this album is interesting. Feel like all their other prog rock efforts are better
|
| |
|
|
