Album Rating: 3.5
i think it's funny that Sput's still factored in on AOTY as a credible critic site after seeing some of these threads sometimes. like, remember when metacritic banned Sput after that trebor amo rev? amazed there wasn't a reprise of that.
|
| |
probably because no one in their right mind would confuse the brainrot you've been spamming throughout this thread for the shred of credible criticism this site has left
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I'm not a staff reviewer, user revs don't show up in the critics section the way, say, your reviews would. so staff reviews should prob be held to a higher standard than us mere users since they are our representation, this one is fine but I mean like other staff reviews in the past have made this site look bad
|
| |
you were referring to review threads, which are also clearly not staff reviews
"I mean like other staff reviews in the past have made this site look bad"
lol well, no denying that if you throw that claim around enough, it'll find something to stick on
|
| |
https://shorturl.at/tyUm5
This one was an embarrassment beyond countless levels of comprehension.
|
| |
lmao
sure was beyond certain people's comprehension
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I misspoke, I'm not good at wording things sometimes lol as for the reviews thing I feel like staff reviews that read as particularly antagonistic towards the listeners that may disagree do not represent the site well and might as well be avoided if possible. Like if the staff doesn't care about the site's perception then take this with the thinnest grain of salt imaginable but when there are things like "objective" and "facts" thrown around for a subjective form of entertainment... you kinda start sounding like you believe you know better than everyone who you disagree with.
I would never say in earnest that I know more than you... but I dont think it needs to matter all that much, music is meant to be enjoyed. Subjectivity gets lost when you start thinking of music as an objective checklist of boxes that needs to be filled for something to be good. Sometimes things just feel good.
|
| |
this is the part where you pull up a single staff review that uses either of those words in the context you just ascribed
bonus points if you can manage it post-2013
subjectivity "gets lost" when you're too busy being precious and defensive to remember you're reading a fucking opinion piece
|
| |
if you can't "parse" it maybe try understanding it instead
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
"anyone with post-rock in their pie who disagrees with either of these facts please show yourself out" - first comment you left on your last Rolo Tomassi review.
"Facts"
They're not facts they're your opinion
|
| |
"first comment you left on your last Rolo Tomassi review"
so not part of the review jfc
|
| |
that's not in the review though, Deathbat.
|
| |
and by "context you just ascribed" i pretty clearly meant face-value use within an opinionated frame of reference (i.e. not under the world's heaviest layer of irony)
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
it reads as to be implied that the review is in service of that addendum that it's not subjective anymore but is instead an "objective fact" that you are wrong and bad for disagreeing with and your taste is to be called into question
|
| |
https://c.tenor.com/MNmWsBYX4qsAAAAd/tenor.gif
|
| |
pretty sure it reads like i credited the users of this site for having enough intelligence to clock that a) opinions are not facts and b) i am aware that they are aware of this, but damn is it easy to hope too much
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
my sarcasm/irony detector is frequently broken so it often just reads like being dickish for no reason
|
| |
i couldn't give a fuck how dickish it reads so long as you don't count me in whatever wavelength of idiocy you're rocking wherein opinions get confused for facts
now hurry up and find me a damming review quote that contains either your buzzwords and is actually from a review
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I can't even lie my most recent example I was going to bring up was that trebor amo review that got us banned off metacritic, was more so saying I'm shocked that didn't get a reprise for something since, sometimes this site just gets MEAN
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
are we actually banned from metacritic
|
| |
|
|