Album Rating: 5.0
neither don't be S E N S I T I V E
|
| |
i'm just asking you why you would think that
|
| |
Does this band have a female member because it definitely sounds like a woman singing near the beginning
|
| |
nope, that's shinji and he does have an androgynous voice.
|
| |
I'm voting against you in March madness until you tell me why the fuck you think I wouldn't like this Kevin
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
lmao
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
its to mitigate any chance of him being disappointed - youre now stuck in the position where he was right all along, or you enjoy something he does too
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Potsy wouldn't like this because it's kinda proggy and Part 3 has sounds that like sound like shit plopping into water idk
maybe he'd like it, part 3 is why this isn't a 4.5 though
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
proggy? i disagree
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
It's a stretched out epic piece of pop music, strongly structured with multiple progressed into sections, but not in a jazz or classical way
RYM lists it as Progressive Pop and I'm 100% inclined to agree (Progressive pop just being a poppier cousin of progressive rock, IE: Kate Bush or ELO or this)
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.3
progressive pop is a fake genre
|
| |
Does this band sound anything like Phish?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I mean if progressive pop is a fake genre, I have no trouble calling this a light poppy progressive rock album, but that just seems like I'm dancing around the term progressive pop
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.3
yeah but calling this a poppy progressive rock album is just dancing around the fact that this is one long dream pop song that really spill into rock territory at all (unlike the releases either side). ambient poop bit notwithstanding, it'd be pedantic to consider this multiphase in the first place if the tracks weren't separated for listener convenience
rule 27 of life says that if you're dancing around genres you're probably doing something wrong tbh
|
| |
Progressive pop was real, (ELO, Supertramp, Alan Parson Project) but people misuse it 90% of the time so it's basically a fake genre.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.3
RIP progressive pop, murdered by ćrsMoriendi 2021
|
| |
|
| |
If it's barely rock music it can't dream pop.
https://rateyourmusic.com/list/irojiten/shinji-sato-of-fishmans-his-own-cd-collection/
based shinji owning Millions Now Living Will Never Die on CD
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"it'd be pedantic to consider this multiphase"
1. I don't know, part 3 sounds nothing like parts 1, 2, 4 and 5, so it does feel very multisectioned in an obvious way, actually same goes for part 4 being pretty different from 1, 2, and 5.
2. The "Bah bah bah" section of Part 4 feels so much like one of those prog cooldowns right before the big epic end of Part 5
3. Do non-prog pop/rock songs really lean on a strong leading musical theme that appears only at the beginning and the end like a huge epic reprise of the opening section?
Even if dream pop is the first genre someone would label this, prog deff still fits too, prog dream pop ;)
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Verse-Chorus-Verse-Chorus-Bridge-Chorus
But, like, each of those sections is 14 minutes long.
Long Season.
It's a 4.5 until you're listening on the toilet, and then you realize it is a 5
|
| |
|
|
