Album Rating: 4.0
a tumescent 4 to a flaccid 4.5 for me, some stunning moments but the weakest album of the epic trilogy
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"they're already playing new songs live"
When I saw them in Philly Gira said next time they were back the lineup would look different (this was already after having a keyboardist and no Thor). Is it still the same otherwise?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Anyone know what the CD packaging for this looks like?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.3
discogs is your friend
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
ugliest cover of the year
|
| |
Is this an essential 2016 listen?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Not essential but definitely worth hearing if you dig Swans.
|
| |
If you haven't heard Swans before, no
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
The Seer and To Be Kind are essentials for the entire Western fucking canon, though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Absolutely.
|
| |
Let's not forget Children of God, White Light From the Mouth of Infinity and Soundtracks for the Blind.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
We shan't forget
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
"Is this an essential 2016 listen?"
absolutely not
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
@Ocean: You're not wrong. One could also throw in Filth and Cop as well. But the two I first listed are sacred above the rest, for me.
|
| |
surprised this didnt get way more attention. thought itd be a soundtracks for the blind magnum opus kinda thing
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
they wore out this formula imo
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Worst post-break up Swans album
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Yeah Burning World is probably in my top 5 Swans
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
second half of frankie m is still masterfully fantastic
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
the t/t is also fucking massive
|
| |
|
|
