Ulver ATGCLVLSSCAP
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
March 30th 2016


21029 Comments

Album Rating: 4.2 | Sound Off

I knew you were a gentleman at heart! They are completely different eras so it's pretty pointless to compare the two; most people have a pretty clear preference of either experimental ambient or black & folk metal.

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
March 30th 2016


116819 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Shadows isn't bm in any way bro lol. But yeah War isn't better than this, it's my least fav of theirs tbh.

Dis_Con_Nec_Ted
March 30th 2016


5098 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Wars is better than this. Also WAY better than Messe. There you have it.

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
March 31st 2016


21029 Comments

Album Rating: 4.2 | Sound Off

I meant it's their best like after the bm era, I wasn't saying that Shadows was post-black metal itself. Jaime had a right to laugh if someone was saying that.

Underflow
March 31st 2016


5297 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

I've pretty much been in love with this more "abstract" era of Ulver, starting with Messe through this. I may be in the minority, but I hope it continues - even if that means we get less Garm.

bnelso55
March 31st 2016


1460 Comments


They're on a good track. I agree with you there, although I certainly would find myself sorely missing Garm if his role as vocalist diminished any further.

DungeonBoy
March 31st 2016


10296 Comments


Messe is so good and definitely abstract. Flow-wise I feel it's very similar to War of the Roses with it's punchy mid-tempo parts stuck between layers of thick long atmospheric sections. I'll admittedly listen to everything they put out regardless of genre, because the band has so much creativity and passion for what they do and it always shines through in someway or another through almost all of their 20 albums/EPs.
Some days I wake up blasting Bergtatt, other days Shadows. Some days I'll even put on Perdition City when I'm craving that post-apocalyptic industrial future sound.

JamieTwort
March 31st 2016


26988 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I wouldn't call this abstract. In fact I'd go as far as saying that the first half of this is some of the least interesting material they've done for a while.

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
March 31st 2016


116819 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Less Garm? Are you high?

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
March 31st 2016


21029 Comments

Album Rating: 4.2 | Sound Off

Everything this band has done since Roses besides maybe Childhood's End has been very abstract.

JamieTwort
March 31st 2016


26988 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

So this and Messe then? lol

I really don't see this as abstract.

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
March 31st 2016


21029 Comments

Album Rating: 4.2 | Sound Off

A lot of this is pretty abstract, Messe even more so though. They've also done other stuff since Roses too, like Terrestrials with Sunn 0))).

ChoccyPhilly
March 31st 2016


13693 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Terrestrials is the definition of wasted potential

DungeonBoy
March 31st 2016


10296 Comments


the 3.3 average of Terrestrials is too high.

JamieTwort
March 31st 2016


26988 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Forgot about Terrestrials actually. I think that's it though.



"A lot of this is pretty abstract"

Depends on your definition I suppose but I can say with certainty that to me most of this is far from abstract. The psychedelic, almost rock-based tracks are nothing all that out of the ordinary within that realm, same goes for the ambient sections which are noticeably accessible.

Jots
Emeritus
March 31st 2016


7633 Comments


if your definition of abstract is the opposite of abstract yeah. there is a certain sum'n sum'n due to the improvised elements but this isn't too bizarro imo

should this be listed as a "live" album or what's the deal there

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
March 31st 2016


21029 Comments

Album Rating: 4.2 | Sound Off

This was too abstract for poor Willie judging by his soundoff.



The material was performed live, but the aftermath of cutting it all together and altering it makes a studio album, according to the band in the liner notes anyways.

Jots
Emeritus
March 31st 2016


7633 Comments


I guess he was using it in relative speak. the idea of what can even be considered "abstract" in music could be interesting to discuss (or not lol, haven't really given much thought). maybe some blog fodder in the future. meh. maybe
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_music

Sniff
March 31st 2016


8437 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Terrestrials is decent. The 3.3 is too low I'd say.

Underflow
March 31st 2016


5297 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

I would consider this abstract despite there being plenty of music out there that is far more "out there" than this.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy