This is the best Slipknot album of them all.It shows a more talented side of them musically.A lot of people hate this album because it's not as heavy but there's more to heavy-metal than just trying to be heavy.
|
| |
i think the album is good, pulse of the maggots and before i forget are my favorite tracks
|
| |
Dude are you ****ing kidding me? Go get a life before you post **** like that again. I can't believe you could put ***** bands like JANES ADDICTION, Red Hot Chili Peppers, Godsmack, Incubus in front of a real metal band like Slipknot. You obviously don't like metal music posting bands like that so don't speak your word on a subject you don't understand.
Slipknot? Real Metal?
Obviously, you didn't read his post. And obviously you don't know shit about what real metal is. Slipknot is a nu-metal band, the poser's answer to metal. They hardly have any roots to some real metal. The lyrics are as of a small child who knows how to cuss. They don't have much talent, except for a few members of Slipknot. They restrain their talent. I swear, I could go on and on.
|
| |
^^^I like their acoustic songs as well. It's odd cause most heavy bands are great at doing slow songs, like Darkness by Disturbed.This Message Edited On 09.18.05
|
| |
They need to keep doin this kinda stuff.This Message Edited On 07.25.05
|
| |
Hmm...I like the album. Not a bad review. I actually like the acoustic songs in this album, I thought it was a good touch. Something different nothing wrong with that. Oh and the solo's...about f--king time.
|
| |
Why do people waste their time going onto reviews for bands that you don't even like just to talk sh*t about them? Go look at bands that you like and comment on them.This Message Edited On 07.25.05
|
| |
I give it a 5.This Message Edited On 07.25.05
|
| |
still has a few gud songs but overall shouldn't have been made a disapointment from a badss band like slipknot
|
| |
still has a few gud songs but overall shouldn't have been made a disapointment from a badss band like slipknot
|
| |
i like old slipknot not new soft slipknot
|
| |
Terrible Reveiw.. I think Slipknot did a wonderful job with their new CD. Although I admit, some of it is rather Stone Sour-ish, which is very... acoustic. But they did a great job on the CD. Then again, I don't know my metal much.. I just bought subiminal verses after the screamo-emo shit seemed like nothing.. Plus, Slipknot is the shit.
|
| |
i personally find this to be the easiest one to just pick up and listen too. i may not listen to it as much as say... their self titled album. but this is still a very good cd. acoustic was a good change, shows they can broaded their horizens and not just say f*ck and sh*t every other word.
4 out of 5
|
| |
300th.
Their new material is alright.
|
| |
Great album, slipknots finest 5/5 for me
|
| |
This album really bores me, and I hate Corey Taylor's voice, both melodic and yelling. The only two good songs on here are Pulse and Blister.
|
| |
The Blister Exists really is their best song on the album if not over all. The rest is okay.
|
| |
My heads spinning Slipknot..... acoustic same sentence Whats next NME shamelessly supporting a band that isn't overerated oh wait....bloc part and Franz Ferdinand. I've heard a lot of the stuff on the album it's experimental and mature with the acoustic parts and the riffs and solo's are some of the best produced from the 'knot boys. I thought you were a little harsh on before I forget
|
| |
My heads spinning Slipknot..... acoustic same sentence Whats next NME shamelessly supporting a band that isn't overerated oh wait....bloc part and Franz Ferdinand.
What?This Message Edited On 09.16.05
|
| |
Like the album, starts slow, works it's way into hard for 3 songs, slows, then BLAST! xD
like it, like a LOT!
|
| |
|
|