Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
a stand-out track as good as the 3rd or 4th best from this album, gotcha
*wink* tee hee
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
some of the new songs ive heard them play live are as good or better than songs on here
|
| |
do you mean on youtube or something or did they come to australia without me knowing
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
youtube
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
does anyone know if Sister Cities is going to be on the new album or was that just a one-off for that webshow dealie?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
think it was a one-off
if the new songs are any bit as good as that fucker though i'll crap my pants
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
looks like sister cities is the closer on the new one
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIPAEclVg-Y
|
| |
sister cities is really great but y'know kinda bummed that we're only getting 9 new songs. w/e though it probably works well on the album.
frances' voice is just slightly fucked up on that new song; it sounds just a little bit more strained than usual whenever she goes into her trademark emotional thing but there's something so endearing about the fact that she just keeps doing it anyway even though she probably shouldn't. it's a pretty wonderful song overall. getting the hype up to serious AOTY contention.
|
| |
9 songs is a pretty standard length for an album
|
| |
true but i'm a greedy motherfucker
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
No Good Al Joad is pretty damn wow
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
god the new version of sister cities on painted shut is fucking killer.
|
| |
honestly i'm not sure whether i like it more than the shaking through version, which had a more fluid and dynamic vocal performance as well as better mixing, though the painted shut version benefits from the rawer sound.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Oh shit. New album. Gotta check it.
|
| |
new one was disappointing compared to this for me
|
| |
really? I enjoyed the new one so much more than this
and I can't figure out why because they're pretty sonically similar, no?
either way, it makes me want to revisit this
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
mm, idk if they're that similar. pretty distinct sounds for me. still gonna need a lot more listens of the new one to make a quality call.
|
| |
really? I enjoyed the new one so much more than this
and I can't figure out why because they're pretty sonically similar, no?
id say they are definitely similar sonically but just a little more bland for the most part. there are tracks here and there (mostly in the front half) that i enjoy, a couple id go back to, but most of it blends together and there are no songs that ripped my heart out like Tibetan Pop Stars did. i don't feel like i'll be revisiting it much.
|
| |
oh Tibetan Pop Stars; yeah that definitely kills anything from the new one
that being said, I think there are more highlights on the new one for some reason... even if none of them reach the heights of TPS
I haven't listened to this since like 2003 though
|
| |
|
|
