Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Again, that's the problem with internet, early leaks and consequently, early reviews. I bet you'd be amazed after really listening to the record.

Though probably not

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

I can't believe that most of the people on this page have listened to the real deal of the record.

Album Rating: 4.0

Does anyone else's ears perk up when you listen to the real album and don't hear the watermark where it was on the leak?

Album Rating: 3.5

How do I change the avatar (image) I use when posting comments on reviews? Can only find options to edit my main profile pic and Musician forums avatar

Album Rating: 3.5

Its under your forum profile, edit avatar.



Username -> Edit my Info -> Edit Avatar

Album Rating: 4.0

@ thegoddamnbatman



The digital release is much better quality so obviously all the songs sound better, but it isn't so different to make someone change their mind about their album. The notes are still all the same, just sounds more full.

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

I just hope that people that have been listening to the leaks give this record a real chance.



It's out there, you can buy it and support it, but what it's important is getting to listen the record with the proper quality. Anyone that got this before last night have actually listen the record how it was suppose to.

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

@someguest



It's okay, someguest, what pisses me off is people writing off this record after listening to crappy 320 kbps transcoded myspace rips.

Album Rating: 3.5

I wonder what day 1 sales were like.

Album Rating: 3.5

Stop ragging on people for "writing off this record after listening to crappy 320 kbps transcoded myspace rips". Sure, production makes a big difference, but not that big of a difference. The music is the same. If a user rates it a 3.5, they're not likely going to change it just because they've heard a bigger, fuller version. Ferchrissakes, it's the same music.



Just saying.

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

I'll just agree to disagree. :war:



We need emoticons.

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Haha, yeah right. This is an album reviews forum, asshole. I'm not here to gain or give blowjobs to the other users. You don't have to like me, I don't need to be loved here. Let's get back to the music, shall we?

Album Rating: 3.5

I've listened to the promo copy so many times that in my mind I say "You are listening to a Vagrant Records advanced promotional stream" while I'm listening to the non watermarked files.

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

@reddan

Actually, I was talking about you and your "social network". I don't need virtual friends, dude. Do you?



@Prophet



haha it happens to me too sometimes. but it's almost fading away.

Album Rating: 3.5

Haha, yeah right. This is an album reviews forum, asshole. I'm not here to gain or give blowjobs to the other users. You don't have to like me, I don't need to be loved here. Let's get back to the music, shall we?

Album Rating: 4.0

@prophet178



Thank you, I've been waiting for someone to agree with me.



And guys...to be completely honest I think moods would be a little better if blowjobs were a more common thing. I think people's biggest reason why they didn't like the album so much is that they lost a lot of their harder edge from VHEISSU, which is perfectly valid. I hope you can agree that if you like heavier music and don't get into the more ethereal stuff and you get songs like wood & wire, you're going to be disappointed no matter the quality of the recordings.

At least its better than The Alchemy Index

Album Rating: 4.0

i guess i'm one of those schmucks who bought into that concept hook, line and sinker.

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Nah, I like this a lot too. Just recently I started appreciating it. It keeps growing better for me and while Alchemy Index was really interesting, this is easier to revists already