I believe that would be a pleasurable experience for the incurable masochist. I assume you're not one?
|
| |
considering that, as a modern internet-based civilization, we are in no way experiencing a shortage in aural entertainment and availability of said media I say there are no sound reasons for that debate to take place at all.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
"REALLLLLYYYYY debating whether or not I should listen to this."
let me help u out
don't
|
| |
then....listen to it?
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
So do I, Snide. So do I.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
I liked it. A lot. In my opinion the "evolution" of metalcore has gotten out of hand. These boys have put out a record that sounds like metalcore did "back in the day" and at this point it's a breath of fresh air. And for that, I am grateful.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Yeah this sucked pretty hard and I dug their old shit.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
The vocal performance mostly. The cleans have declined on every album and the screams could have been better. I feel like their dropping the breakdowns somehow made this more boring. No hooks either. just imo obviously
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
probably yeah
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
didn't sound raw but badly produced in a different way
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
lol it's really not that raw so they fucked up
|
| |
band will never top Apologies, and even that album doesn't exactly have much replay value
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
I think I liked monuments better than apologies actually, but agreed. haven't listened to this band in a long time actually
|
| |
futures hasn't listened to the album
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
"anybody who has this rated above a 1.5 is a fool"
thx
|
| |
"have you?"
it really doesn't need explanation
i rest my case
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
lol [2]
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Their weakest, but it's not that much of a disaster.
|
| |
|
|
