Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
foad Hayley
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Havent listened to this yet should I
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
your face is slightly above average >:|
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
idk if you would like this, hans
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
It's decent Hans, but far from their best.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
I like most of their older radio singles does it sound like that?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
nope
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Not really, try their second and third albums, those 2 are my favorites. I haven't heard point #1 but a lot of people like it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
This is decent.
|
| |
Sci-fi Crimes is hella better
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
k nevermind this gets really boring after the first 4 tracks
|
| |
chevelle b-sides right on through
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
gon kamahameha yo ass
|
| |
galick gun
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Is it just me or is Pinata the standout track on this album... seems the general consensus is that there is not a stand out track on the album but I thought Pinata was. Great mix of heavy riff with Melodic chorus and vocals are top notch with kryptict lyrics that has made must of you chevelle fans??? Plus they even added a solo...
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Okay, well, I feel like this is Chevelle's weakest album since Point #1.
|
| |
unreal lp...envy,revenge and clones are the best
prima donna is a great acoustic track
every other song grew on me by the 3rd or 4th listen...cant stop listening
|
| |
I laughed to myself a little reading this review. It seems that for bands, it's a lose-lose situation writing more than two albums or so. If a band's first album is unique and well-received, everyone sings praises. If they follow it up with a similar album, they achieved another success. But after that, they have to choose from two evils:
1) Continue on with the music they love to write, record, and play, which means being labeled as stagnant, bland, and lacking movement or creativity (ie Chevelle), or
2) Experiment with new sounds and styles, then have to listen to everyone whine about about how they wish the band had just stuck to what they were good at and would go "back to their roots" (ie Linkin Park).
It seems bands are supposed to evolve and experiment, but only a small amount per album. Anything more than a gradual change from one to the next with an overall limit of how far they can stray from the original album over the course of their career is just begging to be trashed.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
No not really. Kid A. Argument is invalid.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
So I just heard Pete say in an interview he wanted to take the band in an industrial direction...
..Whaaat...??
|
| |
|
|
