Metallica St. Anger
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
CakeWithCream
February 14th 2012


1065 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

yeah this review opened my eyes to the glory that is St. Anger

evilford
February 14th 2012


71523 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

lol. nice review.



album sucks. a couple songs are ok, the rest of it is pretty much goofy.

BigHans
February 14th 2012


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Thanks guys, wrote this in 7 mins as a joke, glad you liked it.

IMZA1793
March 29th 2012


843 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Best review ever.

BigHans
April 5th 2013


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

best review ever

ViperAces
April 5th 2013


12609 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

bro you shouldve been around when it was released!!!

BigHans
April 5th 2013


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

yeah no kidding

ViperAces
April 5th 2013


12609 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

jk bro i know it was released like a 100 years ago haha

hogan900
April 17th 2013


3336 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

what happened to Metallica?

KjSwantko
April 17th 2013


12568 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

the above comment is trvth

kris.
April 17th 2013


15503 Comments


they were never good in the first place

KjSwantko
April 17th 2013


12568 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

the fuh

evilford
April 17th 2013


71523 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

agreed except for kill em all and ride the lightning and master of puppets and ...and justice for all

Pestiferous
April 17th 2013


1375 Comments


pretty much evil, after that twas poop!!!!

hogan900
April 17th 2013


3336 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I don't know, I used to be a Metallica fan when ride the lightning was released, and then... This happened.

Artuma
April 17th 2013


32828 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

i used to be a metallica fan too



then i found the other metal bands

NeroCorleone80
April 17th 2013


34618 Comments


Yeah, Metallica are like the metal starter band, after that they just sound bland compared to other
metal bands.

evilford
April 17th 2013


71523 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

except that their first 4 albums are still awesome

NeroCorleone80
April 17th 2013


34618 Comments


They are, but I havent listened to them for years. Thrash in general I find to be one of the most limited metal genres, it gets repetitive after a while.

evilford
April 17th 2013


71523 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

that's what a lot of people say. I agree to some degree but idk I love thrash, I think there are a good amount of groups who are able to embrace their own style and be pretty original even within the genre, i.e. toxik, anacrusis, voivod, sepultura, coroner, aspid, sabbat, exhorder, mekong delta, onslaught, morbid saint etc on top of the more archetypical groups



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy