Album Rating: 5.0
You don't need the comma -_,-
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
ahrd
so fuckin drunk right now but m///// maakes it all seem more stable
|
| |
i can tell because you started typing in all lowercase :]
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
so uch easier bm bro, feel the teeth and chord progressions ahrd
|
| |
pleb go home you're drunk smh
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
im in bed lol jokes on u motherfufker!
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I absolutely love early Yes, Genesis, and ELP, but I must admit King Crimson is far more consistent.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
^ this
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Crimson is the only one of the big four that did not become either commercial or a giant parody of themselves.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
True, but I feel sometimes KC got drowned in its own pretentiousness
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Like after Discipline you mean?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Even in their classic era too, sometimes they're too hard to digest (Moonchild)
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
The only way KC can be hard to digest is when they play some improvisations (like Moonchild)
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
"Moonchild" is brilliant if your used to that from jazz or a similar style.
|
| |
Agreed
|
| |
Disagreed. I'm used to jazz and like a lot of improvisation but the improv in Moonchild is just bad.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Being used to jazz sure seems to make it easier to love Lizard too.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Agreed Snowdog.
And most of the KC's improvs are sadly average at best.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
As much as I don't mind the improvs they make, I do love more of their written songs better. On Court alone, I prefer three of the four songs under 10 minutes to "Moonchild."
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Well, this was Yes back when it was casual to pull classics almost out of thin air.
|
| |
|
|
