Album Rating: 1.0
now let me tell you, my opinion on Bruce Springsteen has done a total 180 in the last two weeks
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Just seems weird someone would 1 an album then say it has a banger, even if I hated everything else I usually try to give the extra half star for that banger's sake
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
imagine putting music on a numerical scale
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
you have a rating, gotcha
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
imagine there’s no heaven
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
1 denotes awful, i don't know why you'd 1 something you don't think is awful all the way through but perhaps I'm built different
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
great album, not awful?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
if Confusion Is Sex by Sonic Youth had A Day in the Life by The Beatles as the 4th track it would still be a 1
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
well that's because the beatles through a modern lens just haven't aged that gracefully outside of like an album's worth of greatest hits
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
new ratings
reviews
comments
lists
The Cure Faith
4.5
12.31.24
The Cure Seventeen Seconds
4.0
12.31.24
The Cure Three Imaginary Boys
3.5
12.31.24
The Cure Songs of a Lost World
4.5
12.31.24
Korn The Paradigm Shift
2.5
12.27.24
Korn The Nothing
3.0
12.27.24
Korn The Serenity of Suffering
3.5
12.27.24
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
about 80% of beatles songs i know even the "experimental" era genuinely just sound the same to me. different structures, sure, but the instrumentation of say, abbey road, is not super far removed from the days of "I Want to Hold Your Hand" that people claim was their simple / bad days
i defo get why they were loved at the time (counter-culture, rebellion, catchy songs, their ability to write an earworm), but i expected a lot more weirdness when people told me they got weird and experimental as time went on, iron butterfly's "in-a-gadda-da-vida" is weirder than almost every beatles song i know
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
it is okay to not love the beatles but takes like that just reveal you have a bad ear for music
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
i expected a more radical shift, like i just don't hear what people described as a "whole new band" from what they said was the "shitty simple" days of songs like I Want to Hold Your Hand. they got better at writing but they're still the same band at the core. i don't see how a song like Imagine is so much worse than all the prime Beatles songs but the average is way lower.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
there are vast differences in the songwriting and composition of their later work compared to their earlier stuff that are pretty remarkable even without factoring in the time period it existed in and how short their career was overall. to not care for them is one thing, to not hear the shift just shows a lack of perceptiveness
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Based Colton
venin this thread was already derailed before you began vexing about all the artists you have a complex about pls just let us return to the poo flinging
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Beatles rule
|
| |
beatles rule
cure rule
sonic youth rule
brat kinda rules
delete your stupid accounts
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
“about 80% of beatles songs i know even the "experimental" era genuinely just sound the same to me”
You have never listened to the Beatles then, because there is no universe where you could say that there is no creative differences between an album like Help to something like Sgt Pepper, that’s just disingenuous .
I’m not like a Beatles megafan or anything but they are incredibly important. Abbey Road and Sgt Pepper are two of my rare 5s, and both are so different but satisfying.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
let’s not poke him any further he’s gonna start talking about how Ulver is a more diverse band and i think we’ve all suffered enough
|
| |
venin is a she and you know that colton
|
| |
|
|
