Album Rating: 5.0
You scum jammed I am a man of constant sorrow?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I try not to call songs filler, but at the same time, there are enough songs on here I don't love to warrant 3.5
In Utero also wrecks this and so does Bleach..
|
| |
well yea in utero is their best for me too, hard 5.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Yes they do. Ars, you would've shite yourself in '92 mate.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Hot Damn! Its the soggy bottom boys
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
"you would've shite yourself in '92 mate."
This came out in 91 though, and a lot of 91 albums were better... Temple of the Dog and Badmotorfinger might have made me shit myself since they're better and came first
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Incesticide wrecks this too
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
There were many albums in 91 that would've caused me to shit myself, this wouldn't have even caused flatulence
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Ten being one of them
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
"This came out in 91 though, and a lot of 91 albums were better... Temple of the Dog and Badmotorfinger might have made me shit myself since they're better and came first"
What happened was people absorbed, digested and idolised. It took a few months after seconds of hearing.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I had an entire phase (most of when I was 14) when I thought Nirvana was the best thing ever, so I've heard this, along with the rest of their work a shitton of times
With that said, even then, I liked In Utero way more than this and my biggest gripe is that it's too poppy compared to most grunge and could use a little more grit
Kurt himself was trying to be commercially appealing when he made this and I guess he got the results he was looking for, but I prefer his other stuff
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
In Utero is a strange album that darts from very accessible to the opposite. This was more of a straight shot walking the line of grunge and accessibility. This album affected my taste in music growing up , but if I do listen to Nirvana nowadays it's either In Utero or B-sides.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
You all understand but you just don't get it
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
i know its almost impossible to be objective toward an album which hold such sentimental value, none of us can really view this in the same light as you zak but personally i loved this from about ages 10-17 then it grew off me fairly strongly and has remained that way ever since. While In Utero has done the opposite.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Okay Zak, why is there to get
please enlighten us
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Ars. Think of the best album you've ever heard then times it by 1000. Honestly when this thing came out it was fuckng unbelievable. Think Potter+lotr+Pokemon+mind blown and it doesn't touch what this thing did. Balls is right. There are better albums. In utero is my best nirvana album but nothing comes close to how this blew the doors off and legitimately so.
|
| |
Nah this album has a truckload of nostalgic value to me as well, and after all those years I still love it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Cultural impact shouldn't matter when it comes to the overall quality of an album
Often absolute garbage will be treated as if it's revolutionary (I mean Justin Beiber beat The Beatles' record of most songs by one artist on the Hot 100 at once.)
This album is very good though, I mean On a Plain and Lounge Act are among some of my favorites, but I don't think that just because a bunch of pop fans decided to get into Smells Like Teen Spirit for a year, that this is somehow a godly album
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Nostalgic as in "fucking raccoons is the shit but I don't know where I'm going now im in me teens" or nostalgic as in "American idiot is great but the 90s was the shit, I wish I lived it"
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Ars trust me you have absolutely nothing to contextualise. Absolutely nothing.
|
| |
|
|
