Brand New Science Fiction
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
neekafat
Emeritus
November 12th 2017


26926 Comments

Album Rating: 4.9

[2]

jk tho that's dumb

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 12th 2017


70256 Comments


"consenting lying groupie 15 year olds"

i didnt realize you could consent to underage sex with an adult before the age of consent, this changes everything!

Frippertronics
Emeritus
November 12th 2017


19720 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

who let nambla onto sput is the real question 🤔

DoofusWainwright
November 12th 2017


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

we're not going to get into an argument about semantics



change consenting to 'groupies agreeing to have sex and lying about their age in order to achieve said aim'





Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 12th 2017


70256 Comments


"we're not going to get into an argument about semantics"

this thread has been arguing about semantics for approximately 3 days now

GhostOfSarcasticBtrd
November 12th 2017


6263 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Your mom's semantics.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 12th 2017


70256 Comments


true

Asdfp277
November 12th 2017


25734 Comments


talking about semantics, doesn't sex imply actual intercourse? did u guys even read the news article about this stuff?

pots u weren't even here up until the very end of the discussion, there hasn't been any discussion on semantics at all save for ghost arguing that pedophilia =/= ephebophilia or whatever it's called

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 12th 2017


70256 Comments


@asdfp depends. sexual intercourse is sexual intercourse. sex acts can refer to any number of things that dont include vaginal penetration

but i think at this point we are kind of talking about this open endedly and generally as jessy is far from the only topical case right now that needs addressing.

GhostOfSarcasticBtrd
November 12th 2017


6263 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

As a Psych major that's definitely not semantics but whatever.

Asdfp277
November 12th 2017


25734 Comments


sending nudes is sex now? hey virgins of the site, i've got good news for you!

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 12th 2017


70256 Comments


"pots u weren't even here up until the very end of the discussion, there hasn't been any discussion on semantics at all save for ghost arguing that pedophilia =/= ephebophilia or whatever it's called"

just because i wasnt participating doesnt mean i wasnt observing and nah people were getting pretty assumptive over the wording of sowings posts even after he went back and clarified

GhostOfSarcasticBtrd
November 12th 2017


6263 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Sowing should have to swap his Deja avi for a #MeToo in bright pink for a month as atonement.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 12th 2017


70256 Comments


sex acts =/= sexual intercourse

exchanging nudes with a minor is a sexual offence

because it is a sex act

Asdfp277
November 12th 2017


25734 Comments


there was no wording issue, he himself said that that's what he meant

nobody said anything about sexual acts, y'all are calling jesse a rapist in the last page and that's not what happened, and it just goes to show y'all the ones that just came to the discussion aren't even willing to inform yourselves about the issue

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 12th 2017


70256 Comments


"Sowing should have to swap his Deja avi for a #MeToo in bright pink for a month as atonement."

lmao

DoofusWainwright
November 12th 2017


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Well, I'm 100% certain what Jessey (spelling?) did was wrong but I'm not 100% convinced he's actually a 'pedophile'.



I'd say the distinction doesn't matter all that much considering the act remains the same act, however he's been defined, but it IS more than just a case of semantics.



There's a world of difference between being labelled a sex pest/creep and an actual pedophile.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 12th 2017


70256 Comments


"there was no wording issue, he himself said that that's what he meant"


thats not true at all he elaborated to significantly clarify that he was trying to remain neutral until there was more information after initially making a comment that could be easily viewed as.... not very neutral

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 12th 2017


70256 Comments


"I'd say the distinction doesn't matter all that much considering the act remains the same act, however he's been defined, but it IS more than just a case of semantics.



There's a world between being labelled a sex pest/creep and an actual pedophile."

agreed to an extent but thats exactly what im saying about sowing lmao he's not necessarily a full on misogynist just because he said something dumb.

DoofusWainwright
November 12th 2017


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

I never read exactly what Sowing said here :/



Did it get deleted?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy