Album Rating: 4.5

what ever happened to Trackbytrackreviews? Did she die

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

she moved on to the aftersputlife

Album Rating: 4.5

that's the same thing

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

oh



oh no

Album Rating: 4.5

@swallowtales - yeah I can see why if you only listen to contemporary music. Production nowadays (both in the mainstream and alternative spheres) is always pristine.

Album Rating: 4.5

I really liked trackbytrackreviews. Not the user, she can eat 1000 dicks but I do like reading track by track revs sometimes

Album Rating: 4.5

There's nothing intrinsically wrong with a track by track review, it's just that they're written badly most of the time. And honestly, some albums call for them.

Album Rating: 4.5

Idc if they're written badly. Sometimes I just want to know what a reviewer has to say about every track on an album without the bullshit

Album Rating: 2.0

best part of a track by track review is that it forces the reviewer to engage with the album in its entirety

i like track by track in concept but it attracts some of the worst writers

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

i should do a track by track review

please do

Album Rating: 4.5

the problem with track-by-track is it requires the reviewer to hear all of them contained within the album

Album Rating: 5.0

tundra moment

So when we getting Hawks vs Tundra reviews?

Album Rating: 5.0

This thread shows there's life in sputnikmusic yet.



Not making any judgement on the quality of life, but there's definite signs of life.

Album Rating: 4.5

the problem with track-by-track is it requires the reviewer to hear all of them contained within the album

Album Rating: 1.0

I can't be arsed getting more excessive negs so no Ulcerate review for you

Album Rating: 4.5

nah, we need the Ulcerate review

nah, we need the Ulcerate review [2] and Hawks BTBAM review.

Don't back out now.