Album Rating: 4.5
Sowing, just start with the debut and run through the discog if you feel like it after!
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
According to Wil, the glitch wasn't intentional, it just showed up in the recording and the band liked it and that particular take, so it was included. I agree that some of the mixing is a little off - except on the singles perhaps - but I like some of the production choices, particularly towards the backend.
I wish Forrest were louder, and the vocals were higher on Passiona, and 25; but I like how mixed down his vocals seem in other songs. At the end of Song For You, at the climax, Wil's almost drowned out, but I think it works. Especially at the "And I know that you hated me that time / BUT I'VE MADE UP FOR THAT NOW, HAVEN'T I?" part.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
'Shine' is an absolute belter. First time really listening to these guys. Like it far more than I expected to.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Production seems fine imo
It Kills Me and Laughing still don't do much of anything for me but most of this is lasting much stronger than I thought it would on repeat listens
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
@Dedicated you should listen more, this band is really something special
@ashcrash tbh this is just growing more and more with repeated listens ... I have listened to this way more times now than I'm willing to admit
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Good lad, Feather. Expecting a 5 anytime soon? Glad this grew on you.
|
| |
can't stand this band
(for the expected reasons)
|
| |
ali why
don't you fuck offffffffffffffffffffffff
|
| |
im always tellin ppl who dont like smithies to jam sigourney weaver once and see what happens but it didnt work for rowbro so i dunno (re: what i just said, the song that brought rowbro over was "my body is a machine" i think)
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.2
I feel we're on different wavelengths here, I've never even heard What Started Off With Tresspassing lmao, and I loved Sigourney Weaver from the first time I heard it (p sure the song that converted me was The Arrogance of the Drunk Pedestrian tho)
or idk are there two rowbros on sput, should I be jealous
|
| |
wuuuut we had a whole thing on my fb
(its not there anymore cuz i deleted my old account)
i think i showed u both sigourney and laika and u werent into it then i linked body is a machine and u were like oooooook this is cool
i think we also talked a bunch about how u thought wil's aussie accent was rlly heavy
|
| |
Wagner is just good at expressing the jumbled constant mess that collides in a lot of our heads. He sings the way I think. (Maybe just a tad more miserably)
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
@Blushful I'm not sure, the album has potential, but it would take quite a bit of time for me to 5 this or decide its worthy of that, I think I'll end up leaving it at a 4.5
@Mega I can agree with that!
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Maybe not on the level of their previous albums, but still really fucking good
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
ugh i really wanted to 4.5 this at first but 10 listens and still not growing on me, "song for you" is the only tune that reminds me of their debut
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
forrest is amazing too
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
While this will be a notch or 2 below throw me in the river and No-one gets lost anymore, they've managed to put together a very consistent discog wit nothing really below a 4 whilst releasing new stuff pretty much all the time.
great band
|
| |
cause they're not taking risks, just putting out stuff with a tried and tested formula. quite careerist of them
|
| |
true but i think the persistent level of emotional intensity across releases keeps them sounding "edgy" even if they dont sound much different from one another.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I don't see that: this album doesn't follow a formula the band has adopted in their previous works, and if adhering to a sound developed throughout their career is a problem, there's not much point in listening to most artists. Just don't see the point in assuming musicians to be careerist. Even more so with a band that, whilst popular, are far from attempting to appeal to the lowest common denominator.
|
| |
|
|