Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off
I don't like a single track on this album honestly.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off
Yeah, the entire thing is fucking garbage from beginning to end. The fact that this is the same band who made Jester Race and Whoracle is depressing
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
It basically isn't
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
I'm tempted for an easy 1 but i don't want to listen to this
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
just give it a 1 anyways
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
"I'm tempted for an easy 1 but i don't want to listen to this"
Just give it a quick listen on Spotify and then give it a 1. It's good for your objectivity stat.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
Btw how does that stat work?
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
objectivity stat is for shitnerds
|
| |
objectivity stats are objectively the best metric for judging a mans character
|
| |
If your objectivity score is over 75% or so it basically means that you're an idiot because you listen to music that you know will suck.
|
| |
not necessarily, but yeah that's often the case. I only rate my fav albums from any given discog anyway because I use them as more of an archive so in case my computer dies on me i know which albums i wanna dl immediately
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
It's mainly affected by how many albums of a certain genre you rate either mostly positive or negative (I think that also goes for bands). If you tate most In Flames albums relatively high, then a sudden 1 would boost your objectivity stat. The reverse is also true (a sudden positive rating if you rate most albums of the genre negative). So the more diverse your musical taste, the higher your objectivity stat will be. That's been my understanding of it anyway.
But yea, a lot of people don't give too shits about it. It doesn't really do anything anyway.
|
| |
I mean ladies obviously froth over guys with objectivity stats >80% but that's not the reason we're here is it
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
I wouldn't know :P
|
| |
DoofusWainwright gets all the ladies apparently
|
| |
"It's mainly affected by how many albums of a certain genre you rate either mostly positive or negative (I think that also goes for bands). If you tate most In Flames albums relatively high, then a sudden 1 would boost your objectivity stat. The reverse is also true (a sudden positive rating if you rate most albums of the genre negative). So the more diverse your musical taste, the higher your objectivity stat will be. That's been my understanding of it anyway."
Huh, that's deeper than I thought. I always thought it was based off how close the average rating is to a 3 and how close the rating variance is to a 1.
|
| |
I always assumed it was just the measure of dispersion of ratings from 1-5
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
this album changed my life
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off
For the worse or for the better
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
The answer is obvious
|
| |
|
|
