First Fragment Dasein
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
MarsKid
Emeritus
May 24th 2016


21057 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

And sometimes that just happens.

Space Jester
May 24th 2016


11560 Comments


You get that download brah?

MarsKid
Emeritus
May 25th 2016


21057 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Yeah, and it's okay so far. Hasn't stunned me yet, but I'm only on the first track. It's heavy, at the very least.

Gmork89
May 25th 2016


8891 Comments


Love how quirky this is, awesome stuff.

Spacesh1p
May 25th 2016


7716 Comments


Check Grotesque

brainmelter
May 25th 2016


8542 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

[1,395]

Dmax28
May 25th 2016


1452 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Look at that color and style coordination with the featured albums on the front page. Beautiful.

MarsKid
Emeritus
May 25th 2016


21057 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

All it needs is a little Grotesque tbh.

MarsKid
Emeritus
May 25th 2016


21057 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Aight, was good fun being on the featured page again. Thanks to everyone for supporting the review and for all your comments!

Spacesh1p
May 25th 2016


7716 Comments


Eh I wasn't really making an argument, just stating that for my taste it's a bit overly technical but yeah you do you.

Spacesh1p
May 25th 2016


7716 Comments


I can live with this lol.

MarsKid
Emeritus
May 25th 2016


21057 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Wank is an overused argument though, I agree with that.

brainmelter
May 25th 2016


8542 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

this doesnt even really wank,

archetype is so good on this

Kusangii
May 25th 2016


8460 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Calling this wank is just dumb and wrong

CameronLaD
May 25th 2016


255 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

It sounds like The Faceless' Planetary Duality if that album wasn't an unlistenable clusterfuck.

Spacesh1p
May 25th 2016


7716 Comments


Nice opinion, Kusan. Another stellar contribution to the thread.

Kusangii
May 25th 2016


8460 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Lol like I have to explain myself for that statement. If anyone in all honesty call this a wankfest, one can't possibly have heard much technical music at all. Just because there's a lot of blast beats and sweeps every now and then doesn't automatically make it wank when you have meaningfull riffs and songs that actually go somewhere.

Spacesh1p
May 25th 2016


7716 Comments


Forgive me for wanting a bit more than "lol" or "you're stupid if _______." Personally I didn't call it a wankfest, just said that for my taste it's a bit tech-y. I don't find it very enjoyable to listen to.

Kusangii
May 25th 2016


8460 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

You said "Sweep, blast beat, repeat." which is absolutely blasphemous and innacurate. If you cared to listen with some humility and indulgence you'd notice there are some highly skilled and detailed compositions going on. I know this isn't for everyone, nothing is, and that's okay. Your statement is just annoying and incredibly flawed.

Spacesh1p
May 25th 2016


7716 Comments


It must be hard to use the internet when you take it this personally if someone disagrees with you. To me, it's a lot of sweeps and blasts, not a whole lot else. I didn't posit that as right or wrong, just as my assessment.If that makes me a philistine listener to you, so be it. I don't really know what else I can say to you to demonstrate that I'm speaking just my opinion and not facts.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy