The Beatles Abbey Road
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Wizard
October 13th 2009


20627 Comments


I'm a fanboy but I'm a fanboy because I think the Beatles are that good. Not just to be one. This is a classic album IMO. Did not think the reviewer backed up his points well.

Why is that fuckface?

Yotimi, you're an idiot. Quit trying to argue.

Athom
Emeritus
October 13th 2009


17249 Comments


holy shit, I've never seen the_wizard angry.

Wizard
October 13th 2009


20627 Comments


Work made me tired and then I come home to pukes on Sputnik. I still spread the love though.

Athom
Emeritus
October 13th 2009


17249 Comments


lol

SCREAM!
October 14th 2009


15755 Comments


Why is that fuckface?

Yotimi, you're an idiot. Quit trying to argue.
YOU THOUGHT THIS THREAD WAS INTENSE BEFORE!!! ITS ON NOW!!!!



MentalityOfA
October 14th 2009


1217 Comments


I do agree with the rating.

hastapura
November 24th 2009


56 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Um...I don't this this is very well written, but I'm not going to neg because you have some wicked sack to put this out there. Some of your points, though, are just wrong. If the Beatles are seen worldwide as one of the greatest things ever to happen to music, then it stands to reason that their influence is still felt today, which makes them slightly more than "another British band that holds little relevance of anything important to today's music."

But hell I'll give you a positive, for your balls.

robertsona
Emeritus
November 24th 2009


28660 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

wicked sack

KILL
December 3rd 2009


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

gd review

Phantom
December 3rd 2009


9010 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

this review/thread was in tents

qwe3
December 3rd 2009


21836 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

hahahahaha wicked sack. that made me laugh so hard



Essence
December 3rd 2009


6809 Comments


DUDE HE'S GOT A WICKED SACK

moonlapsevertigo
January 2nd 2010


29 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

don't agree but you backed up your opinion well. Though I do have to disagree with you saying that they don't have any cultural relevance. They have TONS my friend.



I suggest coming back to this album and listening to it again a few years from now. I used to not really like the Beatles, and though they are not my favorite band, I like them a good deal now.

StrizzMatik
January 3rd 2010


4232 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Thread and review are lol and tbqfh the reasoning behind the arguments was pretty thin but it was a well-written for a rant

KILL
March 30th 2010


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

BANG BANG

robertsona
Emeritus
May 1st 2010


28660 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

wicked sack

EVedder27
May 1st 2010


6088 Comments


hey so I heard this is pretty good

GoatsOnABoat
June 27th 2010


57 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

That is ridiculous. I cannot understand your rating at all. One of the best albums from one of the best bands, well, ever.



Sorry, in my opinion, you are very wrong.

KILL
October 2nd 2010


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

i want you SO BAD god this album rules

DinoX
December 5th 2010


3582 Comments


Review is good.

Who gives a shit about influence, it is about how good the actual music is and this blows. Lyrics are very poor. I've rated albums high where people copy/ paste lyrics from them to make fun of me better than anything on this shit.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy