Obscura Cosmogenesis
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
bastard
February 8th 2009


3432 Comments


It's not that bad. Just incredibly unoriginal


this plus its pretty boring.

Phantom
February 8th 2009


9010 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I don't find it that boring. Repetitive, yes.

Zoo
February 10th 2009


3759 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Does repetition not lead to boredom?

jingledeath
February 10th 2009


7100 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

not you too zoo

Zoo
February 11th 2009


3759 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

It has its moments, but they don't last very long and are few and far between all the boring ones. Not only that, but nothing I listen to it will stick with me longer than ten minutes after I hear the album. Unlike other albums with songs that will be stuck in my head for weeks, the songs here are rather easy to forget completely.

jingledeath
February 11th 2009


7100 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I can see where all the negativity is coming from but I still kind of enjoyed this. Universe Momentum is a great track.

Phantom
February 11th 2009


9010 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Does repetition not lead to boredom?


True. I definitely can't listen to this all the way through in one go, but a few tracks at a time and it's pretty solid. Definitely not the best tech death around ofc, we have Spawn Of Possession, Gorod and Necrophagist for that.

BallsToTheWall
February 11th 2009


52578 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I'd take these guys over Necrophagist easily although technically, 2/4 of the band are old Necrophagist. Not big into tech death so hence how this turned out. I might be a tool and say i'm not interested in expanding my tech-death horizons but we'll see how things play out from here.

Phantom
February 11th 2009


9010 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

There's nothing wrong with the review, it's just people's opinions of the band.



I wouldn't go fully into it, just check out the top bands. It's starting to get kind of over saturated with lower quality bands anyway.

jingledeath
February 11th 2009


7100 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

emphasis on Gorod

FascoPoop
February 16th 2009


13 Comments


Ok, so really why does everybody seem to hate the album on account that it sounds like other bands!? It doesn't make this album a bad one. The guys from Obscura found inspiration in cynic, necro and death. What's wrong with that!? They're all good bands, I enjoy them all and I'm glad a band does something which blends all of their styles. It's just awesomeness.

I'd probably hate it if the album had been a bad combination of the three fore mentioned bands, but it sounds good. I gotta admit it's not original, but why should I care? Artists keep ripping off other artists all the time.

Yazz_Flute
February 16th 2009


19174 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

i guess ill check out gorod then....



I thought this was really good, borderline 4.

Wizard
February 16th 2009


20627 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Gorod absolutely slays these guys. Truthfully, I ended up buying this album for some extra wankery when I'm in the mood.

AngelPhoenix
February 16th 2009


2761 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I could barely get through these guys myspace tracks, never mind the whole album.

AngelPhoenix
February 16th 2009


2761 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

lol I usually all but completely ignore metal vocalists. The instrumentation here is sloppy, haphazard, uninteresting, etc etc. It's just all over the place in a really bad way, for me anyway.



Gorod is super awesome. This Message Edited On 02.16.09

DBlitz
February 16th 2009


1693 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

It doesn't really matter how good the guys in the band are on their instruments when the vocals totally stink


it does

BallsToTheWall
February 16th 2009


52578 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I have zlich problems with the vocals. I don't see why anybody hates them a smuch as they do. Uninteresting? Complete horseshit.This Message Edited On 02.16.09

DBlitz
February 16th 2009


1693 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

dude you are confusing as hell, don't start this "cause they can play their instruments they are objectively good" thing. you are saying that you can't go through the album, that its like every other tech band, hardly original, its alright, etc. If you think its "alright" rate it average or something. if you actually like this like your rating implies stop acting like you don't

BallsToTheWall
February 16th 2009


52578 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Who are we talking to here?

AngelPhoenix
February 16th 2009


2761 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Definitely uninteresting. Your review however was very interesting as it is very well done.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy