Really dont see how this is fresh at all. You can trace this back to lots of noise/post-hardcore(the dissonance of their mathcore roots) /industrial. Hell, the first track is a blatant tribute to Martin Rev.
|
| |
They combine their influences well though. (as good albums do) Much less contrived sounding than their early albums
|
| |
I was under the assumption this was as bad as swans
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
this is better than swans
swans suck
|
| |
Filth is the extremity of the punk ephos. Its pleb filter ;)
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
This is definitely on Swans’ usual level
|
| |
Imagine loving neurosis and giving Souls at zero a 4.5 but not seeing any value in swans
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
filth is trash, dude
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
I think it’s perfectly fine to love Neurosis and not Swans, different bands. I don’t place ‘value’ on music, just enjoy listening to certain artists/albums etc. and not others. There’s no grand equation to work out based on any other factor inc. influence, legacy or the like.
|
| |
They have an awful lot in common. Its not a matter of legacy or objective value.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
They have similarities if one chooses to see that, sure. However, they’re not so remarkably similar that liking one and not the other should appear unusual to anyone.
|
| |
The only early Swans album I like is Filth tbh. But I'm not the biggest punk fan so whatever.
|
| |
This is as good as the worst Swans album.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
all the 2s and 3s in this thread are making me more depressed than the album itself does, where did all the cool people go
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
here I am friend
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
yayyy
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
4.5 and 5 gang where u at
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Zombie, ButtBoy and I are holdin it down for now but we need reinforcements
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Incoming! Already excited for their european tour in April
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Don't know wtf Swans is but they suck and this is a hell lot better and way different than Swans. Enough?
|
| |
|
|
