Album Rating: 3.0
This is alright. Not nearly as bad as some people have made it out to be.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
Pin the Grade and Hungover You are so fucking bad
|
| |
Album has 0 depth and doesn't try to. I respect that. New JEW hits a lot of the same spots.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Not even remotely as terrible as California but still pretty bad.
|
| |
Honestly, im not sure what a "respectable" blink album would sound like and who it would alienate.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
songwriting, production, catchiness, no cringe...what you would normally expect from old blink, in other words.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
oh, and a good dose of toilet humor which, of course, since they weren't able to pull it off anymore they made up by experimenting on their self titled and on a lesser degree on neighborhoods
|
| |
No cringe and toilet humor. Good luck with that one. I guess my point stands.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
sure. because a bunch of 40 year olds faking songs for teenagers works just fine.
|
| |
dude youre asking for toilet humor.
|
| |
Is this really that bad?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
It's really not that bad
|
| |
Its fun and easy listening.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off
As someone who thinks California is absolutely one of the worst albums of the decade, this isn’t that bad. Gigantic improvement.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
I want an EP entirely in the vein of No Heart To Speak Of stat
|
| |
An album in Dog Eating Dogs style would rule too, tom withstanding.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off
1000% agree Symbolic, that’s easily their best song in like a decade lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.6
"these 40 year old men could really reduce the cringe if they wrote more songs about fucking dogs" - internet dude
|
| |
Hm I thought California was alright but I really am just not a fan of blink in general
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
This is no California but it's great on it's own.
|
| |
|
|
