Still not quite sure what’s so special about this one.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.3 | Sound Off
that's very unfortunate, sorry for your loss
|
| |
What’s even the point of a 4.7 rating...
|
| |
It’s for when you feel like it’s a 4.7/5.0 or at least that’s my guess.
|
| |
Sure, but how does one come to that conclusion in the first place?
|
| |
Do you have an album that you enjoy that is not quite a classic in your eyes but on the cusp of it?
|
| |
Yeah, they’re rated 4.5! 😃
|
| |
To each their own but in some cases the sentiment is a bit more specific & thus warrants the distinction.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.3 | Sound Off
I like to use my staff privileges to be needlessly discerning, so what of it ;)
|
| |
Okay going to go away now. You all play nice.
👍
|
| |
one of the few things I want to accomplish on this site is to 4.9 an album as a power move
|
| |
Okay Acad.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I would hop on the gif profile pic bandwagon immediately
.1 differentiation ratings is a pree cool feature though and clavier you should 4.9 this just to spite this naysayer.
|
| |
Naysayer is one of the only good things Architects has done in recent years.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Halfway through the first song and I hate the vocals. This is going to be tedious.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
yeah for some reason state champs changed their vocals a ton
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
And not for the better.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
You 1'd this and its still at a 4.3 hahaha dork
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
I'm gonna slap a 3 on this and never touch it again probably.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Someone's got a prob with the gif profile pic bandwagon eh?
|
| |
|
|
