Red Hot Chili Peppers Stadium Arcadium
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
IsItLuck?
Emeritus
February 4th 2007


4960 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

this CD is a bunch of meh. Some really good, some bad.

DekWannaBFlea
February 7th 2007


284 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This album is way to long for its own good.

mands
February 7th 2007


19 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

It took me a while to actually get into this album. but once i did.....

donniedarkofan2006
February 18th 2007


16 Comments


i love this album

samthebassman
February 18th 2007


2164 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

cool album, great to see a double album especially

Altmer
February 18th 2007


5714 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Mediocre, RHCP have done better.

grungeguy88
February 18th 2007


788 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Gets very old. I can only remember a couple songs out of 28. Consistant though.

The Door Mouse
February 18th 2007


2092 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

It is long as hell but most of the songs are very high quality.

inked
February 24th 2007


4 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

i'm not a big fan.. some cool stuff, but for that many tracks, i had hoped for a lot more.

Squamish
March 16th 2007


84 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Good album, probably my favorite behind BSSM. Not a big fan of their pre-Frusciante stuff, though.

Yazz_Flute
March 16th 2007


19174 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Uplist mofo party plan was great, but the first two releases were pretty crappy.



Great album. BSSM is a better, and maybe californication. I also really like OHM.

antihippy
March 31st 2007


696 Comments


"Cons:
Hard to get into for a casual listener"


.......

other than that, good review. red hot chili peppers are okay, not that much of a fan. but i know someone who is a massive fanboy.

and they spelled CHILLI wrong!

antihippy
March 31st 2007


696 Comments


and does the funky stuff outweigh the poppy stuff on this album? cos i'm thinking of buying it.

Yazz_Flute
March 31st 2007


19174 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Uhh...on the jupiter cd, there might be a more even mix of funk and pop, but the mars cd is mostly pop. So there's pobably more poppy stuff here then funk. None the less, it's my second favorite chili album, and i hate almost all mainstream music :o

antihippy
March 31st 2007


696 Comments


i like their poppy stuff, i just love their funkier side more.

Bassistftw
April 9th 2007


1 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

meh....

xraycat
April 15th 2007


9 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

[null]

MyRamona
May 8th 2007


1098 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I really feel as though they have become a complete parody of themselves with this album. I mean, Crazy Town could have made this album from a bunch of B-sides....if they were better musicians.

Bron-Yr-Aur
May 8th 2007


4405 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Snap it's Ramona.



Yeah my initial joy at this album gave way over the ensuing months to dazed misunderstanding. It just declines in quality the longer you have it, or some shit.

MyRamona
May 8th 2007


1098 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Yo bro. It's just the material is all the same structure-wise and they never really experiment with different sounds anymore. don't get me wrong, I think Snow's riff is a masterpiece, but that song could've been on any of their later albums. A bit hypocritical since I am a die-hard Ramones fan.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy