Album Rating: 4.5
were true rockers
|
| |
*respect*
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
:D
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
a 3? what the fuck
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
the tone or prose of this review is good but you did a terrible job at justifying your rating imo.
Saying the melodies, songwriting and solos are "bad" really doesn't amount to much. If you can't go
into great detail about what makes these things bad, other than vague descriptions about them being
"appalling" or "repetitive", then anyone who loves this album is just going to assume you are
essentially trolling - or just being a contrarian for attention.
Not posing or negging, it doesn't deserve either. I find this review to be pointless
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
UnpopularOpinion
|
| |
The name of my penis isn't an opinion sir.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
was fun to read though and worded quite well, I just think you need to work on your reasons behind disliking this a little more
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
this album cover is so dope
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
its 2pac and a puppy : D
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
dat ranking
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Lol no.
|
| |
Oh hell nah
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
What.....?
|
| |
Yeah sorry the more I read this review the worst it gets, first you're redundant as hell and as you go you just get more and more nonsensical or pointlessly vague
And if you really want for the album to be analyzed completely on its own without any cultural influence then don't mention its popularity at all outside of a few quips, just talk about the album, no one here needs to be reminded that this band is very famous my fucking grandparents listen to this shit
|
| |
What are sample-like synths?
Also, corrupt vocals?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Neg'd for being a pussy.
I could understand your rating, but you don't create an alt just because you're worried about your approval percentage. That's just stupid.
Plus, "appalling melodies", seriously bro?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
... Oh dear
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Review isn't poorly written, it's actually quite well written. Just that ridiculously low rating.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
There have been times I've listened to this album and thought, "Why do people like this so much?” There isn’t a lot going on. So I can sort-of understand the rating. The review has some interesting points, but I don’t think you can dismiss 40 years of opinion and say the album has “lazy songwriting”—not without more info to back it up—not if you want to be taken seriously. I think this album's genius is its simplicity and repetition, and those “guitar rhythms and solos” that the review says “overstay their welcome” sound very good to me. I would welcome more. . . . On the other hand, this would be a good review for the new Pink Floyd album. I think it contains almost all of the flaws that are mentioned here.
|
| |
|
|
