Taylor Swift Fearless
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
kitsch
October 1st 2009


5117 Comments


[quote=kitsch]omg i luv taylor swift she is such an aWeS0mE songwriter and singer omg not afraid to
put her emotions and relationships right out there on the line omg she is a fighter and doing
wonderful things for young women and omg i luv country with pop sensibilities and omg i listened to
this after i got raped by a lesbian and it was so healing TAYLOR SWIFT U RAWK MY CAWK SO MUCH I PUT IT
IN A SAWK [/quote]

best post in entire thread

ScorpionStan
October 7th 2009


1912 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

oh my gosh how did i miss that post? hilarious haha

RandyfromPennywise
October 9th 2009


752 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5



my f**king god this is good



*dies of embarrassment*



Love Story is AWESOME.



----



also can i be the first person to say that i would

thanks





strikey, you win for these first two comments.

Relinquished
October 9th 2009


50089 Comments


I know I'm late like hell but I just found this

[img]http://13.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kq4xwy6yNx1qzxam8o1_400.jpg[/img]

AtavanHalen
October 10th 2009


17919 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

JUST NOW? REALLY?

Knott-
Emeritus
October 11th 2009


10259 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

can i say i still would

RandyfromPennywise
October 23rd 2009


752 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Strikey you most definitely can. I just got my tickets in the mail. I am a 24-year-old heterosexual male and I just paid AU$100 to see this lovely lady play her music live. She is the shit.

Knott-
Emeritus
October 23rd 2009


10259 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

5!!!

DiceMan
October 23rd 2009


7066 Comments


"Stephen Christian can write much more intricate and complex music than Taylor Swift" yeah but that doesn't mean Taylor Swift sucks at making music. There are plenty of people that can create much more eloquent posts than you, so why are you even posting? Why don't you just leave commenting to the professionals?



AlexTM510
October 23rd 2009


1512 Comments


why is this categorized as "other"?

...should this be pop?

RandyfromPennywise
October 26th 2009


752 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Can we change the ratings so I can give this a 6?

Knott-
Emeritus
October 26th 2009


10259 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

hahaha

ScorpionStan
October 26th 2009


1912 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

"Stephen Christian can write much more intricate and complex music than Taylor Swift" yeah but that doesn't mean Taylor Swift sucks at making music. There are plenty of people that can create much more eloquent posts than you, so why are you even posting? Why don't you just leave commenting to the professionals?




you're comparing apples to oranges, stupid argument. and are you trying to say there is such a thing as "professional commentors?" that certainly is news to me.



besides, if you had actually read all my posts you would have seen that i NEVER SAID that she sucks at making music. her music is good for what it is, but IT is just standard pop. It's all been heard before. the chord progressions and melodies are pleasant, but they are also extremely simple and were overplayed 4 decades ago. the lyrics are passionate, but also quite juvenile.



basically, it's an average pop record. i can understand why people like it, but 4.5's and 5's? that's just outlandish.

Knott-
Emeritus
October 26th 2009


10259 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

if i reviewed this i would give it a 3.5



but i enjoy it a hell of a lot more than it is objectively good



therefore my personal score is a 4.5



because it's like my 5th most played record of 2008

klap
Emeritus
October 26th 2009


12410 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

what the fuck is up with this trend of rating something different than what you'd review it as? i reviewed this as a 4 - i rate it a 4. why the discrepancy

ScorpionStan
October 26th 2009


1912 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

ah...NOW you tell me strikey. lol



that would've saved a bunch of the argumentation in previous threads if you had mentioned that before. i thought you were actually trying to defend that the album is 4.5 quality music.

robertsona
Emeritus
October 26th 2009


28660 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"if i reviewed this i would give it a 3.5



but i enjoy it a hell of a lot more than it is objectively good



therefore my personal score is a 4.5



because it's like my 5th most played record of 2008"





makes no sense whatsoever





music isnt objective wtf is this

klap
Emeritus
October 26th 2009


12410 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

^word. the whole art of reviewing is subjective - why review if you're not going to give it your 100% opinion of something?

Smug
October 26th 2009


234 Comments


This album is terrible. Whoever disagrees just has bad taste in music.

/thread

ScorpionStan
October 26th 2009


1912 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

^well you would tend to agree with me then, Smug.



Klapper and robert:



i personally wouldn't review albums differently than i would rate them either, but strikey has a point. there are times when you just totally connect with an album or song on an emotional level, and then it doesn't really matter if the song or album is generic, simple, immature, or displays little musical skill or artistic talent. you will love it anyway, just because you connect with it emotionally.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy