Sum 41
All Killer No Filler


4.0
excellent

Review

by punkbass0327 USER (2 Reviews)
October 15th, 2006 | 9 replies


Release Date: 2001 | Tracklist

Review Summary: When you think of pop-punk, this is what you think of. This album is full of catchy hooks, memorable melodies and fun lyrics. A definite buy for even a casual pop-punk fan or someone looking to get into Sum 41.

Sum 41:
Derek Whibley: Lead Vocals, Rhythm Guitar
Dave Brownsound: Lead Guitar, Vocals
Cone: Bass, Vocals
Stevo32: Drums, Vocals

When Sum 41 came out with All Killer No Filler in 2001, many viewed the band as nothing more than a cash in on the success of pop-punk bands such as Green Day and blink-182. After all, Jerry Finn produced this record for the band, just as he had done for previous albums by Green Day and blink-182. Does this mean that Sum 41 is nothing more than commercial pop-punk band whose only purpose is to make money for the record companies, or are they truly a good band that deserve to be where they are today? Based on the work on this album, the latter would be more truthful. Sum 41, while not revolutionary or progressive, certainly don’t belong in the same group as bands like Good Charlotte or Simple Plan, Sum 41 comes out with a truly solid album in All Killer No Filler.

Musically, the album does not meet the technicality standards set on later records by Sum 41, but there are plenty of catchy hooks and nice riffs. In Too Deep is a prime example of the solid guitar work in All Killer No Filler. The song was a successful single, and rightly so. With an unforgettable intro and a fine solo, this song is the cream of the crop as far as guitar work goes on this album.

Not much great things can be said about the bass in this album. Most of the time Cone is just playing root notes of whatever chord the guitar is playing. There’s a nice little bass part in the interlude of Motivation, but other than that, there’s not a lot there. Cone really is in Sum 41 not because he’s a great bassist, but more because of his personality and stage presence.

The drums are not much to right home about. Stevo gets the job done, and has some nice fills thrown in, but he mostly just keeps the beat and doesn’t go outside of the box too much. Remember, this is pop-punk. Therefore, extreme talent in drumming isn’t necessary.

One negative side of the album is that there is some filler. Even though the title of the album says there is none, every track isn’t of great quality. Songs like Summer, Never Wake Up, All She’s Got and Crazy Amanda Bunkface seem like pure filler.

All Killer No Filler does do a good job of counteracting the weaker songs with real solid classic pop-punk songs. Fat Lip was the first single off the album and probably the most popular Sum 41 song of all time. With a catchy intro, rapping verses with unforgettable lyrics, an anthem chorus and a soft bridge, this song is what comes to mind when thinking about catchy pop-punk. In Too Deep, Motivation, Handle This, Rhythms, Nothing On My Back and Heart Attack are also songs that highlight the album.

Another part of the album that draws attention is the last song, Pain for Pleasure. The song is sung by Stevo, the drummer, and is an obvious tribute to old glam metal. While short, it still gets you listening with its metal guitar work and really crazy singing by Stevo.

In the end, this album is worth a listen to anybody, even if they are just a casual fan of pop-punk. For anyone looking to get into Sum 41, this is a great record to start with. It’s got plenty of catchy pop-punk songs that are still remembered today, and longevity is something hard to accomplish in pop-punk. It’s not without its flaws, but overall it’s a great album.


user ratings (1708)
3.5
great
other reviews of this album
metallicaman8 (3.5)
...

Acey (4)
Sum 41 is a great pop punk band to listen to if you are getting into the genre. This is still one h...

Leemah (4.5)
...

superpeer (4.5)
...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Hatshepsut
October 16th 2006


1997 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Roar paragraphs.

Hatshepsut
October 16th 2006


1997 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Put it in paragraphs in a way that it matters.

The Sludge
October 16th 2006


2171 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

You edit your reviews on your profile page, it will take you to the page where you submitted your review, then put separations in between each paragraph.



Why does it matter if it beat Acey's or not, your goal should be "this will be the best review for this album period."

tom79
October 16th 2006


3964 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Listening to this album again, I find is just average. I liked it a lot when I was 12 though.

The Sludge
October 16th 2006


2171 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I also digged this way back in the 9th grade era. I couldn't stop listening to it then, but as DTLI and Chuck came out, this just ran stale.

RottedFlesh
October 16th 2006


213 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I'm no fan...but I gave it a three because I too USED to love it.This Message Edited On 10.15.06

Zmev
October 16th 2006


983 Comments


post involving the word paragraph

Acey
October 16th 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

nice review punkbass.

/votes

i like your take on it.

bassman963
October 16th 2006


83 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Punkbass, great job on the review.



I used to love this album. But I moved on from it to different things and when I came back to it it was just not as good.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy