Exodus
Impact Is Imminent


1.0
awful

Review

by Pascarella USER (29 Reviews)
March 15th, 2026 | 13 replies


Release Date: 1990 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Impact Is Imminent proves that not every disaster is fabulous.

Oh, dear reader. The roller coaster drops again.

If Fabulous Disaster represented a climb in the chaotic career of Exodus, then Impact Is Imminent is the moment when the cart violently plunges down the track. And this time, it’s not just the production that raises eyebrows, but also the songwriting.

The production has somehow gotten worse again. This is 1990. Thrash metal already sounded massive on records like Rust in Peace and Seasons in the Abyss (and we were one year away from the Black Album), while Exodus seems stuck with a thin, harsh, almost amateurish sound. At times it genuinely feels like a garage band recording.

Don’t believe me? What is that guitar tone at 48 seconds into the title track? What on earth is that horrible sound? And the snare drum throughout the entire album? Lifeless. No punch, no energy. Good heavens, it’s 1990!! Couldn’t you guys do any better?

But the problem goes beyond the production. The compositions also feel like a huge step backward: generic riffs, songs that rarely stand out, and a constant sense that the band is just going through the motions. To make matters worse, Zetro’s vocal lines often sound awkward and strange.

The final result of Impact Is Imminent is an album that sounds odd, uninspired, and frustrating. It’s as if a band capable of writing classics had suddenly forgotten how to do it.

And this impression doesn’t seem to be merely personal — it also appears to reflect the general perception of this record within Exodus’ discography. Here on Sputnikmusic, for instance, the album holds the second-worst rating in the band’s catalog (losing only to Force of Habit).

Spotify numbers tell a similar story. Among Exodus’ studio albums, this is by far the least listened to:

• Tempo of the Damned — 58.5 million
• Fabulous Disaster — 32.8 million
• Bonded by Blood — 32.1 million
• Blood In, Blood Out — 16.3 million
• Persona Non Grata — 14.7 million
• The Atrocity Exhibition... Exhibit A — 11 million
• Force of Habit — 10.9 million
• Shovel Headed Kill Machine — 9.9 million
• Exhibit B: The Human Condition — 8.2 million
• Pleasures of the Flesh — 5.1 million
• Impact Is Imminent — 3.37 million

Of course, popularity has never been the most reliable yardstick to evaluate a cultural product. But lacking something better, it’s the imperfect thermometer we have (in Brazil we even have an expression for that: “it’s what we’ve got for today”).

I wish I could comment on specific songs or highlight particular moments — something that stood out, something worth saving. But unfortunately almost everything here sounds the same. The tracks pass one after another without leaving much of a mark, forming a large blur of generic riffs. By the time the album ends, it feels like you’ve just listened to forty minutes of the same song.

In the end, the roller-coaster metaphor remains the best way to understand the career of Exodus. After a respectable climb with Fabulous Disaster, Impact Is Imminent represents another steep drop in the track. Almost nothing here excites, and almost nothing truly stands out.



Recent reviews by this author
Exodus Fabulous DisasterExodus Pleasures of the Flesh
Exodus Bonded by BloodTardigrade Inferno Hush
58 Diet For a New AmericaMatanza Pior Cenário Possível
user ratings (384)
3.2
good


Comments:Add a Comment 
Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
March 15th 2026


32316 Comments


Imagine someone reading this who had never heard this album before. Or this band, for that matter. What have they learned by the end of this? That you think the production and mixing/mastering is terrible. That's it.

This isn't a review. It's a historical lookback but it's not enlightening in the slightest

And this impression doesn’t seem to be merely personal — it also appears to reflect the general perception of this record within Exodus’ discography. Here on Sputnikmusic, for instance, the album holds the second-worst rating in the band’s catalog (losing only to Force of Habit).


"The hivemind agrees" isn't the support system you want it to be when reviewing something on the site you're quoting

artiswar
March 15th 2026


16695 Comments


That album cover surely bumps this up by at least 1 point

ToSmokMuzyki
March 15th 2026


15433 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

whoa is this 2011

RVAHC13
March 15th 2026


2967 Comments


I wish, I had some nice hair back then

Koris
Emeritus
March 15th 2026


22714 Comments


"This isn't a review. It's a historical lookback but it's not enlightening in the slightest"

Yeah, that's been most of his discog review so far. Half of the Pleasures of the Flesh review was just him listing other albums that came out that year, lol

ShartHarder
Contributing Reviewer
March 15th 2026


639 Comments


i dont think this is a terrible review but @Pascarella you def need to structure them better. I get these are all part of an overarching discog revist you seem to be doing, but to Deviant's point reading them in isolation doesnt give much. you also need more commentary or insight than just 'the production sucks'.

Maybe try structuring like:
- Background/context to start (where are Exodus are in their career, state of thrash at the time)
- Thoughts on the album and tracks (the production, what you liked, didnt like, etc etc)
- Conclusion (comparison to other albums of the time, where it sits in Exodus's catalogue, etc)

That might go a long way to improving them. Personally I've found sticking to the background > review > summary format to be the easiest way to write a review that makes sense (some may disagree reading my reviews!)

LouBreed
March 16th 2026


430 Comments


I am always in favor of reviewers voicing their honest opinion, even if you write a 1.5 review of my favorite album I'm fine, as long as it's an honest take. But a). churning out two reviews for the same band in one day is a bit too much and makes it seem like you have a personal grudge against the band (even though the other review is sort of positive). b). This is not their best album, but it's not a 1.0 level disaster, and neither is Pleasures of the Flesh. At their worst, they're just regular heavy metal albums from the eighties, and both of them have their above average moments. Besides, every thrash band outside of the Big Four had production issues throughout the eighties. Given Exodus history of turbulence and mismanagement/neglect by their label they should be excused for not having squeaky clean sound. And should they really? It's a thrash metal album, there's nothing wrong with sounding rough.

Your Bonded by Blood review had some merit, but this is just foaming at the mouth

Jmal00
March 16th 2026


340 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I don’t have evidence that Gary Holt had sex with the reviewers mother and never called her back… but I believe this to be the case.

ToSmokMuzyki
March 16th 2026


15433 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

posers be posin hey

Pascarella
March 16th 2026


84 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

ShartHarder, I agree that I can improve my texts. We can always improve in everything, right? Especially me, since I’ve only been doing this for the past three months. I’m in the learning process and I truly appreciate the constructive criticism.

On the other hand, let’s be honest: the “controversy” isn’t about the structure of the text, my emphasis on specific aspects, or anything like that. It’s about the opinion I expressed in the score. If I had said everything I said but given higher scores, I’m sure there wouldn’t be so much “controversy.”

Do you agree with the possibility of what I’m saying?

And again: thanks for the coment, bro.

Pascarella
March 16th 2026


84 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

LouBreed, believe it or not... I love the band!!! LOL! I'm being 100% honest! I had the honor to promote a show of the band in Rio de Janeiro in 2014. They were awesome! But I have issues with the first albuns! What can I do? lol

Pascarella
March 16th 2026


84 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Deviant, I'm sorry, bro. But I don't agree with your point about "hive mind". There's nothing controlling the fans preferences. Low grades here and low streams in Spotify are the consequence of a really bad album. Fans (in general) don't apreciate some albuns. I just tried to put that in perspective. You may not agree (no problem at all), but I stand by what I said.

Peace, bro.

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
March 16th 2026


32316 Comments


That's not what I'm saying. Just because Sputnik collectibely doesn't like this album, and you're choosing to review this album on the same site, doesn't excuse the lack of depth in your criticism. It's a very hand-wavey generalisation predicated on the idea that people will simply agree without any analysis. My point has nothing to do with the general lack of appreciation for this album at all

On the other hand, let’s be honest: the “controversy” isn’t about the structure of the text, my emphasis on specific aspects, or anything like that. It’s about the opinion I expressed in the score. If I had said everything I said but given higher scores, I’m sure there wouldn’t be so much “controversy.”

Do you agree with the possibility of what I’m saying?


No, it's about the content of the review. No one has said anything to the contrary in this thread.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy